dadnlad
Well-Known Member
Old shipping containers one world Cup stadiumlego
Old shipping containers one world Cup stadiumlego
When do we get a chance to vote this **** out?Just need Andy Burnham to change his surname slightly to Barnum and away we go.
Could even call it “The Greatest Show on Earth”
Beep beep parp !!
It will need Russian type cyanide , or that woman out of James Bond with the poison knife shoe trying to kick his shins. Maybe an exploding cake at the stadium unveiling ?When do we get a chance to vote this **** out?
Inside the swampScruffy will be pushing up the weeds before this happens.
In which case we want all the income from the rags to be used to reduce ticket prices for City fans.I agree mate and it probably is nonsense but it's the kind of commercial arrangement that I can see Khaldoon rubbing his hands together for.
You know..... I'm sure I've heard these words before but for the life of me I just cannot think where.....Not in my lifetime
If they are allowed to ground share I want my seat sterilising after each of their matches. I will also require the club to send me a video of it being done.I agree mate and it probably is nonsense but it's the kind of commercial arrangement that I can see Khaldoon rubbing his hands together for.
I might have misread it but I thought the bit highlighted referred to Labour and this place is a raving cesspool of Left Wing politics, so I just thought he'd been dragged up on that.I assumed it was more that he'd got himself into a frothing rage and was blaming everyone under the sun for something that is just a pr exercise for the Stretford scruff bags.
It's a real problem these days, invent a problem then use media, both social and traditional, to get people angry then give them a nebulous target for that anger.
Bread and circuses bullshit.
And still increase the cost of our season tickets no doubt.The Mirror seem to be suggesting the rags want to use the Etihad while Salford is a building site.
My initial reaction is of course get to fuck, but I wouldn’t put it past the soulless accountants at City to be receptive to the idea.
paragraphs.I'm pretty certain that any government would have to get involved in a project as huge as this would be, if Badenoch was prime minister I can 100% guarantee that her government would be saying the same thing.
If you take out the political and footballing tribalism out of it you'd probably agree. If Salford Reds or whoever plays at Old Trafford Cricket Ground (Lancashire I guess?) wanted to expand or build a new ground and the government (local or national) agreed to get involved and use the project as a focal point to allow them regenerate and invest in the area, on top of the money put in by the sporting bodies involved then there wouldn't be this outcry. I'd go so far as to say that if a government saw an opportunity to bring money into the country and to get a good return on their investment into a project then they've been pretty damp negligent in their duties if they don't get involved.
Having said that, it still feels like you're creating this into an issue to get angry about as the link to the Mirror article states that the government would look into getting involved in regenerating the area but none of the money will go to the sporting side of the project and even that article doesn't say the extent that the government would get involved and what they would get back from the project in the long term. How can you be so upset when we have little to no information about a project that almost certainly won't go ahead to the extent that United's PR team are trying to alleged? If the government put £2m into regenerating an area and got £5m (arbitrary figures pulled out of thin air, like a lot of the facts and figures used in these stories) back over time would that be fine with you? Or would it only be fine if it was a Conservative or Reform UK government doing it? Or would it be OK if the project was elsewhere in the country and didn't involve United?
As I said a lot of the whingeing going on seems to come from a place of sporting, or going off the language of your posts more likely, political tribalism. That is unless I missed the outpouring of wailing and gnashing of teeth when Boris Johnson approved the use of publiic funds in a similar manner to that suggested in Trafford when Spurs built their stadium.
Mayor approves ambitious plans to redevelop Spurs’ stadium
The Mayor has given final approval for the £400m development of Tottenham's new stadium.www.london.gov.uk
Or the Merseyside council approved money to be used as part of the regeneration of the area around Everton's new stadium.
![]()
Combined Authority announces up to £45m plan to support region’s biggest regeneration project in more than a decade
<p>Funding will provide jobs, training and improved health and wellbeing for local people as well as act as a catalyst for ‘transformational regeneration’ of north docks and area around Goodison Park.</p>www.liverpoolcityregion-ca.gov.uk
very goodJust need Andy Burnham to change his surname slightly to Barnum and away we go.
Could even call it “The Greatest Show on Earth”
Beep beep parp !!
They are going to do it the same way the pyramids were built.Allegedly they are going to build the stadium off site and ship it down the canal.
Is this feasible? There are no docks to moor ships and no cranes to lift the kit off.
Can anyone on here answer the question that the media refuse to ask ?
need an ark?The point you are missing is;
Is the ship canal, with all it's years of neglect, deep enough to carry a ship full of circus stuff ?