United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
So... £665.5m annual revenue, which is about 767m euros (currently)

Deloitte https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/serv.../analysis/deloitte-football-money-league.html
has them down as achieving 770m euros annual revenue the previous year.

So, given currency fluctuations (+ or -), they have literally stood still since the previous year, when everyone else who remained in PL or similar European competitions, I'm guessing will have generated an increase in revenue - TV, commercial, matchday, back of sofa's.

'Record revenue' seems to me as very much polishing a stagnant turd.

Next year's Revenue - with the lack of new sponsors (no replacement for Tezos AFAIK), Melitta going after so long, reduction on current sponsors due to no CL (Adidas etc), no European football (TV, commercial & matchday reductions), no LC (mainly matchday reduction), likely reduced historical PL payouts (again)... is where the turd gets flushed with a free-falling revenue.
 
Last edited:
They had 11 home cup matches last year and that's before the TV and prize money

This year, the most they can have is 4 and that's assuming that they're good enough and lucky enough to progress to Wembley in the FA Cup with every game at Old Trafford

They'll also have to account for their extra spending from funds that nobody seemed to know about
 
Honestly the media spin for these bastards is amazing ...............they are shit but hey the made record revenues :)
No Europe bummed out of the league cup early bet them revenue will somehow rise again next season ...............still thats the bonus of having a glory hunting fanbase
 
Scaring Europe to Death said:
They had 11 home cup matches last year and that's before the TV and prize money

This year, the most they can have is 4 and that's assuming that they're good enough and lucky enough to progress to Wembley in the FA Cup with every game at Old Trafford

They'll also have to account for their extra spending from funds that nobody seemed to know about
Click to expand...
I'm surprised they didn't televise the Brackley v Rag Kids last night.
 
Le Havre Oswald said:
What are the odds of them getting relegated?
Click to expand...

£33m debt this year, £113m debt the year before £28.7m the year before. So that's £174m over the 3 year qualifying period. No covid period to help them out this time. They have to find £70m of relief from somewhere which would be an another extraordinary amount to wave away by the PL.
 
mancboy said:
These accounts will be published and the idiots will eat it up and bleat on as always but the maths quite simply dont add up, no cl football, no new tv deal, they would have got a bit for the el run but not a significant amount yet they have record revenue, wheres the extra money coming in from?
Click to expand...

It's all detailed in the accounts, or the business desk article.

They increased sponsorship by £30m due to 2 new deals. Matchday went up because they played 5 extra home games.


They seem to have some very big exceptional costs which make the headline numbers look better, but really by now we (City fans) should be well versed from the 115 case how unlikely it is that they're faking the books because of the huge number of people being involved across multiple public companies and the liability it would involve. Reading half a dozen comments on here about second accounts or fake accounts is like reading clueless kids rant about City on twitter.
 
BerkshireBlue said:
£33m debt this year, £113m debt the year before £28.7m the year before. So that's £174m over the 3 year qualifying period. No covid period to help them out this time. They have to find £70m of relief from somewhere which would be an another extraordinary amount to wave away by the PL.
Click to expand...
But we know the PL will.
 
domalino said:
It's all detailed in the accounts, or the business desk article.

They increased sponsorship by £30m due to 2 new deals. Matchday went up because they played 5 extra home games.


They seem to have some very big exceptional costs which make the headline numbers look better, but really by now we (City fans) should be well versed from the 115 case how unlikely it is that they're faking the books because of the huge number of people being involved across multiple public companies and the liability it would involve. Reading half a dozen comments on here about second accounts or fake accounts is like reading clueless kids rant about City on twitter.
Click to expand...
https://archive.ph/C5Wad
 
Record revenues isn't a particularly interesting statement, everybody in this league at least, are regularly posting record revenues. The TV money is so vast that it dwarves anything else now.

The net loss is the clear signficiant figure here and that's after all of the cost cutting they've done. They've cut everything possible and whilst they have reduced losses substantially, they have still have made a net loss, that should be a big concern.

They arent getting CL anytime soon to raise their necks above water, they don't have many saleable assets anymore. They'll have a big payout to make soon enough when they sack amorim and replace him. They have plans for a new stadium to fund as they can fuck off asking for handouts on that. Any suggestion this is a positive set of figures for them comes from somebody who hasn't a clue what they are looking at.

It's a bleak immediate future ahead for them and its going to be glorious.
 
domalino said:
It's all detailed in the accounts, or the business desk article.

They increased sponsorship by £30m due to 2 new deals. Matchday went up because they played 5 extra home games.


They seem to have some very big exceptional costs which make the headline numbers look better, but really by now we (City fans) should be well versed from the 115 case how unlikely it is that they're faking the books because of the huge number of people being involved across multiple public companies and the liability it would involve. Reading half a dozen comments on here about second accounts or fake accounts is like reading clueless kids rant about City on twitter.
Click to expand...
Thats is true but i thought it was well documented that they had one set of accounts of red football and one set of accounts for manchester united and one is presented to avoid ffp issues?
 
Citi-leaks said:
Amorim is a dead man walking. He has 3 games to save his job. That would bring us up to November international break. Which also coincides with him being manager for over a year.

He has a clause in his contract that if he is sacked within the first 12 months, he receives 12m in a severance pay out. If he is sacked after 12 months, he only gets half that.

If When they lose to Chelsea he is gone.
Click to expand...
 
BerkshireBlue said:
£33m debt this year, £113m debt the year before £28.7m the year before. So that's £174m over the 3 year qualifying period. No covid period to help them out this time. They have to find £70m of relief from somewhere which would be an another extraordinary amount to wave away by the PL.
Click to expand...
Not long before we see MUFC Ladies on eBay.
 
I’d love it if we have won the 115 case we released the outcome today, just to overshadow their revenue bull shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top