who wrote their accounts, jk rowling?
who wrote their accounts, jk rowling?
The only reason they got rid was because he was shite as well in his last couple of seasons.I still don't understand why they got rid of De Gea AKA the Alpaca?
Wasn't he their player of the season for three years running?
He saved them a shit load of points (if you'll pardon the pun).
Not that I give a flying fuck, mind you.
I'm enjoying the pantomime. Long may it last.
These accounts will be published and the idiots will eat it up and bleat on as always but the maths quite simply dont add up, no cl football, no new tv deal, they would have got a bit for the el run but not a significant amount yet they have record revenue, wheres the extra money coming in from?
Come on get with the narrative they made all that money and thats all that matter ............forking out nearly 700 million doesnt come into it ...........Made 665.5 million but spent 683.9 million is that correct ?
I'm surprised they didn't televise the Brackley v Rag Kids last night.They had 11 home cup matches last year and that's before the TV and prize money
This year, the most they can have is 4 and that's assuming that they're good enough and lucky enough to progress to Wembley in the FA Cup with every game at Old Trafford
They'll also have to account for their extra spending from funds that nobody seemed to know about
What are the odds of them getting relegated?
These accounts will be published and the idiots will eat it up and bleat on as always but the maths quite simply dont add up, no cl football, no new tv deal, they would have got a bit for the el run but not a significant amount yet they have record revenue, wheres the extra money coming in from?
But we know the PL will.£33m debt this year, £113m debt the year before £28.7m the year before. So that's £174m over the 3 year qualifying period. No covid period to help them out this time. They have to find £70m of relief from somewhere which would be an another extraordinary amount to wave away by the PL.
https://archive.ph/C5WadIt's all detailed in the accounts, or the business desk article.
They increased sponsorship by £30m due to 2 new deals. Matchday went up because they played 5 extra home games.
They seem to have some very big exceptional costs which make the headline numbers look better, but really by now we (City fans) should be well versed from the 115 case how unlikely it is that they're faking the books because of the huge number of people being involved across multiple public companies and the liability it would involve. Reading half a dozen comments on here about second accounts or fake accounts is like reading clueless kids rant about City on twitter.
I disagree.Getting those books cooked and there are some still not having it.