gazinho
Well-Known Member
Gigi's fantastic save was from one of them, but the other escapes me
I assume is was sesko's backpass in the first half pretty sure it wasnt going in though from my vantage point in 314
Gigi's fantastic save was from one of them, but the other escapes me
Was it not the "shot" from the Sesko kid (one for the oldies?) early on, which Donna controlled with his hand, got up and cleared it routinely. As Ali Mann said, "It was never going in..."Gigi's fantastic save was from one of them, but the other escapes me
Hate to help the twats out, but there's one or two I might be interested in renting for the night (or < 30 minutes)Not long before we see MUFC Ladies on eBay.
Howson brings in guarantee of being right.He brings no guarantee of success
Not sure, I'd have thought it was the one where Sesko was through on the right early on, looked like he maybe controlled it with his arm, but Donnarumma came out and blocked the shot with his shoulder.Was it not the "shot" from the Sesko kid (one for the oldies?) early on, which Donna controlled with his hand, got up and cleared it routinely. As Ali Mann said, "It was never going in..."
Yeah, read that in a post after I’d put that on here.Those figures are for the previous 4 full seasons, they don't include this seasons figures.
Yup - you could create a multi-million pound turnover company by selling ten pound notes for £9.50."turnover is vanity, profit is sanity"
Whichever way you polish it a turd will always remain a turd.Manchester United submits the accounts of its UK-registered subsidiary, Red Football Ltd (RFL), for Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) assessments, rather than the Cayman Islands-based Manchester United plc, resulting in a significantly lower pre-tax loss figure. This discrepancy is due to RFL's accounts excluding exceptional costs, such as Sir Jim Ratcliffe's minority stake acquisition costs and other currency-related financial costs, which were incurred at the plc level but not passed down to the subsidiary. This strategic reporting has provided the club with more financial headroom for spending and has influenced how its PSR compliance is perceived.
***C&P from AI
It stinks doesn't it?
they spent about 50million if that the rest pilled on debtBut still spend 200m on players
But Sky can roll it in glitterWhichever way you polish it a turd will always remain a turd.
that rob dorsett ? buzzes about everything hes there go to they use like tv programes using upbeat music england rags cartel clubs clear n obviousBut Sky can roll it in glitter
erm theirs would be +2 and ours +226 .......Just think, if Erling and Tijjani had put away those golden chances, it would be zero.
And ours would be +228.
Every person within their worldwide fanbase has gofunded a quid each. Easy!How the fuck have these cunts made revenues of £650 mill
Yeah, I was thinking of the specific difference against them, but that’s not what it is.erm theirs would be +2 and ours +226 .......
That may not be broken till February 2027, when they are toiling in the Championship.The last time the rags won two league games on the bounce was February 2024