Mention of war crimes and genocide but then solidarity with Kim Jong Un? The chap who blows people to bits in a stadium?Good question
Absolutely ....
...... thanks for the context .... can't even spell nobhead.
Kim Jung whatever disagrees ... no fucker wants to play with his deterrence.
Imagine banging out 'regional terrorist industry', 'blackmail' and 'international law' to obfuscate from your solidarity with the genocidal rogue state of Israel.
Say it out loud you fucking coward.
I mean the reformed takfiri president of Syria was on another tour of European capitals last week and hosting Zelensky this week ...... whatever next indeed.
Given the insanity of the timeline I'm not into predictions aside from you not have any grasp on anything beyond easily repeatable soundbites.
As I replied to @domalino, I wont/can't disagree with those facts.On average, the cost of oil on a tanker was $150 million, days before the straits were closed.
Posts shit take .... wanders off claiming victim status. Totally on brand.Mention of war crimes and genocide but then solidarity with Kim Jong Un? The chap who blows people to bits in a stadium?
Wowser we've gone downhill. Enjoy your evening mate!
Has Ukraine ever threatened to nuke Russia prior to the Russian invasion? No. Ukraine would love nukes now because of the simple fact that it was invaded. This isn't the case for Iran, it's a false equivalency because Iran was not attacked at random.Sorry but every single post just reveals how ignorant you are to this.
Iran and the US agreed no HEU in return for dropping sanctions. Trump ripped up the deal and imposed the heaviest sanctions he could on them.
So to then turn around and say Iran could avoid sanctions without an agreement is complete and utter bullshit.
As to why Iran thinks it needs nuclear weapons, you literally just answered that question yourself with North Korea. Ukraine and Libya other glaring examples.
There’s always one apologist going for the biggest terrorist state in the world on here.
Recent logic seems to be that Iran are bad because they kill their own people. Israel are not as bad because they only kill other countries civilians, babies, kids, women etc.
It’s unbelievable Human brain can be so devoid of any sense. Or maybe it’s not human brains but AI brains.
Are you suggesting that Ukraine was attacked at random?Has Ukraine ever threatened to nuke Russia prior to the Russian invasion? No. Ukraine would love nukes now because of the simple fact that it was invaded. This isn't the case for Iran, it's a false equivalency because Iran was not attacked at random.
We can all fucking read an opinion piece in the Western media, from someone who is also an associate fellow of a weapons industry funded think tank. At least they get paid for it. Sad ****.Has Ukraine ever threatened to nuke Russia prior to the Russian invasion? No. Ukraine would love nukes now because of the simple fact that it was invaded. This isn't the case for Iran, it's a false equivalency because Iran was not attacked at random.
Iran has no defensive need for nuclear weapons. Iran is equivalent to Russia or even Israel in its need for nuclear weapons which is it needs nuclear weapons so that it can defend itself from its own twattery.
It was more the US I was referring to but yes, Israel attacking them too. Regardless of what Iran has or hasn’t done, this wouldn’t be happening if they had a nuclear weapon. It’s the reason nobody bothers with North Korea.Yes the answer is Israel but why is Israel attacking Iran? Can anyone even stomach to say it?
I'm not going to argue that Israel aren't a key problem too because they are. That is a problem that the west can and should control but I don't agree that Israel is the sole bad actor and Iran is somehow defending itself. That's utter bollocks. This is (was?) a regime that has murdered its own people to sustain itself.
No Israel would likely not be attacking Iran.
Would Iran then under the protection of nukes continue to fund and arm terrorist groups or countries such as Russia who attack the west and Israel? Of course they would so it would be shitty foreign policy to allow them to proceed?.... And this is why they haven't been allowed to proceed.
Probably referring to me?There’s always one apologist going for the biggest terrorist state in the world on here.
Recent logic seems to be that Iran are bad because they kill their own people. Israel are not as bad because they only kill other countries civilians, babies, kids, women etc.
It’s unbelievable Human brain can be so devoid of any sense. Or maybe it’s not human brains but AI brains.
No, I was saying that Iran was attacked because of what Iran does elsewhere via its proxies. It wasn't a random attack because Israel or the US got bored and for example fancied some oil.Are you suggesting that Ukraine was attacked at random?
What do you mean by ‘at random’?
By your logic, right or wrong, if someone is providing funding or weapons to hezbollah or Hamas, they are legitimate targets of aggression ?No, I was saying that Iran was attacked because of what Iran does elsewhere via its proxies. It wasn't a random attack because Israel or the US got bored and for example fancied some oil.
Ukraine was not attacked at random, it was invaded by a maniacal state which ironically in the context of this thread is one that is armed by the supposedly peaceful state that is Iran............
Edited for accuracy.Probably referring to me?
I have said numerous times that I criticise Israel and Netanyahu should be in a dock in the Hague ..... but I just can't help burying my condemnation in loads of paragraphs blaming every other actor in the region in a poorly veiled effort to equivocate away their utter barbarity.
60% of North Koreans are in deep outright poverty to the point that many don't even eat regularly. Nuclear weapons therefore preserve the North Korean regime but they fail miserably to preserve the North Korean people.It was more the US I was referring to but yes, Israel attacking them too. Regardless of what Iran has or hasn’t done, this wouldn’t be happening if they had a nuclear weapon. It’s the reason nobody bothers with North Korea.
I have no view on North Korea. 21% of Uk population officially lives in poverty and how much does Uk spend on defence?60% of North Koreans are in deep outright poverty to the point that many don't even eat regularly. Nuclear weapons therefore preserve the North Korean regime but they fail miserably to preserve the North Korean people.
Thanks for enlightening us further ... thank fuck we did get Guardiola instead of you.60% of North Koreans are in deep outright poverty to the point that many don't even eat regularly. Nuclear weapons therefore preserve the North Korean regime but they fail miserably to preserve the North Korean people.
Right, and what does that have anything to do with my post, or our conversation, at all?60% of North Koreans are in deep outright poverty to the point that many don't even eat regularly. Nuclear weapons therefore preserve the North Korean regime but they fail miserably to preserve the North Korean people.
Yes you are correct and that's the exact war that has been playing out in front of us. Iran could not strike us directly so it struck our allies such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the UAE and then the Strait of Hormuz.By your logic, right or wrong, if someone is providing funding or weapons to hezbollah or Hamas, they are legitimate targets of aggression ?
Would that apply to USA, UK or Europe who fund and supply weapons to Israel ?
The UK measures poverty by the relationship between income and housing/living costs. Estimates of poverty in North Korea are achieved by estimating the number of people who actually die of outright starvation simply because there isn't enough food to keep the population alive. But yes they have $bns+ per year nuclear weapons.I have no view on North Korea. 21% of Uk population officially lives in poverty and how much does Uk spend on defence?