Bigga
Well-Known Member
I was commenting on your illogical conclusion that this indictment means that “Russiagate” is false. It’s not difficult to understand my point if you really wanted to.
What's "illogical" is not giving room to the possibility that "Russiagate" started from a single point that snowballed into a monster of its own making.
It doesn't mean other people involved should be indicted too if they believed the original information.
'Someone shouts 'Fire!' in a crowded room and everyone runs hurting others in the process. That original person is caught. Does that mean everyone that ran and did further damage should be prosecuted too?'
THAT is illogical.