bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Fucking nutjobs
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US Politics Thread
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Ok now that you had your fill. Can you start that inflation discussion up?What’s Trump’s current favorability rating? Now do Jorgensen!
Nice logic, Foxsucker.
“Oooooh, I can’t vote for any ‘Dem’. Ooooooh, but I can’t vote for Trump either, he’s not nice. Oooooh, what am I to do?” Imagine going to war with you. So yellow Patton would have slapped you.
We know why you want the narrative changed as “conservatives” look more and more insane every day, and those who enabled them (like you) look dumber and more afraid to stand up to them every day. Cowardice is your stock in trade.
You and all the other intelligent folks can get it rolling. I'll be on the sideline cheering you on.
Yeah, don't worry Foggy actually isn't as stupid as he pretends to be on these threads. He knows that. Just likes playing to the gallery :)one thing I like about the US is that if you don't believe or in some cases know or just couldn't be fagged voting for a candidate is for you then you don't have to and hopefully are not bullied or shamed into doing so as around 35-50 per cent choose not to every 4 years.
I question whether Trump was really the cause of the jump. The jump was unlikely due to an anti-Trump surge. More likely than not, the laxing voting laws across the country due to covid (i.e. sending ballots to everyone on a States voter registry, that allowed stay home voting and ballot harvesting) probably played a larger role.In oz its compulsory albeit a small fine if you don't and many deliberately choose to vote donkey.
Rarely does the vote get over 60 per cent of those who can and the jump from 54 in 2016 to 62 in 2024 was largely due to those who were keen to see the back of Trump rather than the prospect of a new dawn under Biden.
Lolso you are trying to suggest that they can model the likelihood of voter turnout, they can take into account numerous variable..... but they can't model the variable of participating in polling? Things such as the TX ballotbox, how would you model that that legislation was brought in during the voting and they would have nothing to model it on
Can interest you in buying a bridge from me?
I don't either. It's just Foggy chasing his own tail :)As you know I don't have a dog in your fight with Fog, however, just to state that Neolibs do have a sauce for their blame.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
I mean... what the actual fuck?
M
M
mat
Guest
Well
That hearing showed Trump is a ****. Who knew?
That hearing showed Trump is a ****. Who knew?
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,880
- Team supported
- City
I mean... what the actual fuck?
I’ve watched Fox a few times, surely people can’t believe what they’re saying?
Even without critical thinking you’d be laughing at how dumb some of the stuff is.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
They actually do. It's fucking poison.I’ve watched Fox a few times, surely people can’t believe what they’re saying?
Even without critical thinking you’d be laughing at how dumb some of the stuff is.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
I presume the sideline is where you’ve spent your life, and thank Christ for that.Ok now that you had your fill. Can you start that inflation discussion up?
You and all the other intelligent folks can get it rolling. I'll be on the sideline cheering you on.