Var debate 2019/20

[VOOMER]

The ref or linesman could be called out on their ‘mistakes’ , now the linemen are flagging one week not the next , refs just take no responsibility at all , handing the blame to var, remember var is just another ref , two tiers of cheating instead of one .

Meanwhile the monitors remain unused. They figure its more jobs for which they get paid, they are happy to uck it up.

 

[ballinio]

Explain why Wolves goal was ruled out????
For the exact same reason Sheffields goal was ruled out, for the exact same reason Norwich goal was ruled out. For the exact same reason Firmino's against Villa was ruled out, while being 1 down none the less, with us still in the race. VAR is used wrong, the laws as they are doesn't link well with the technology VAR possess. That doesn't mean its out to get us though.

Jesus beating 2 men to the ball and score is irrelevant. VAR looks for handball in the build-up, and the law says if its found the goal have to be ruled out. Again, the law is the wrong party here. Not VAR.

There has been angles for Van Djiks supposed handball, where it clearly shows the ball never touches his hand. It has been angles from the Laporte incident clearly showing the ball touches his hand. If you choose to ignore them that is up to you. But don't fucking say other people lie to suit their opinion then.

Norwich’s goal wasn’t offside , neither was Wolves . Van dykes clearly touches his hand & Laportes is impossible to tell , your just making stuff up again , you are a wind up merchant , lieing , making stuff up , i’d Prefer if you didn’t reply to my posts anymore as I struggle to deal with incompetent fools .

 

[Bluearmy]

Where did the Liverpool thread disappear?

Here's my reponse to a Liverpool fan pretending the be a City fan.

"I don't think you are a City fan, but I shall respond. Your answers are unconvincing.

You argue that "they were afftected by VAR as much as us". How? By listing several decisions against Liverpool most of which correct. Problem is there have been numerous favourable decisons for Liverpool and not one for City before last night. There is a clear discrepance between the favourable decisions for both clubs and your response doesn't explain it away at all.

You don't explain the Christmas fixture schedule, you don't make sense of itl. Why? Because you can't. It's in Liverpool's favour, no two ways about it. Instead you are trying to deflect the point by arguing that City had easier fixtures at the start of the season and easier fixtures in the cups. But this argument isn't convincing either. First, the cup draws and the fixture schedule in the league are supposed to be completely independent, it's not like PL has compensated City for the Christmas schedule with favourable draws in the league cup and the CL. It's not like the PL has decided City to have easier fixtures at the start and to compensate Liverpool with easier fixture schedule at Christmas. It doesn't work like that at all. Second, to have a number of consecutive league games against top 6 teams when the CL groups are decided (November and December) is not obviously beneficial. Third, last season City lost 3 games against average/poor teams and only one game against a top 6 team. The notion of easy and difficult fixtures does not quite apply when it comes to City.

Basically, you have no anaswer to why the PL has made it easy for Liverpool around Christmas and you have no response why City haven't had favourable decisions during the first half of the season. There is a clear tendency of helping Liverpool win their 1st PL title and not let City win several league titles in a row and damage the brand. I suppose next season they will help Man U or Chelsea or whoever seems capable of challenging for the title."

We’ve had a few decisions in our favour. Encroachment called twice against West Ham and Wolves both Pen’s missed originally but scored when retaken only because of VAR. Plus Mahrez pen at Wolves in the first place off the top of my head! Then Shef Utd last night!!

We’ve had a couple of dodgy ones too no doubt, but its not all one way

 

[ScottSinclair]

Norwich’s goal wasn’t offside , neither was Wolves . Van dykes clearly touches his hand & Laportes is impossible to tell , your just making stuff up again , you are a wind up merchant , lieing , making stuff up , i’d Prefer if you didn’t reply to my posts anymore as I struggle to deal with incompetent fools .

The level of conversation here is simply emberrassing at times.

You don't struggle to deal with incompetent fools. You struggle to argue against people that doesn't share your delusion.

What you choose to believe is not my problem. I only ask you to stop attacking posters capable of having a balanced opinion, because that is what this board needs.

 

[Asa's left peg]

When you see the two pictures that are on social media of the two handball incidents (one the Leicester centre half against liverpool and the other ATA in our game against liverpool) and the one he gives is where the arm is closest to the body, you know that VAR isn't the only issue.

 

[alexmcity]

We’ve had a few decisions in our favour. Encroachment called twice against West Ham and Wolves both missed but scored when retaken because of VAR. Plus Mahrez pen at Wolves in the first place off the top of my head!

Against Wolves is the only time it really mattered. And at this point we were already out of the title hunt. Wham away the game was already decided , the result was 3:0 at the time. So, no, we haven't had favourable decisions which influenced the final result. Liverpool have had several.

 

[Bluemanc100]

Explain why Wolves goal was ruled out????
For the exact same reason Sheffields goal was ruled out, for the exact same reason Norwich goal was ruled out. For the exact same reason Firmino's against Villa was ruled out, while being 1 down none the less, with us still in the race. VAR is used wrong, the laws as they are doesn't link well with the technology VAR possess. That doesn't mean its out to get us though.

Jesus beating 2 men to the ball and score is irrelevant. VAR looks for handball in the build-up, and the law says if its found the goal have to be ruled out. Again, the law is the wrong party here. Not VAR.

There has been angles for Van Djiks supposed handball, where it clearly shows the ball never touches his hand. It has been angles from the Laporte incident clearly showing the ball touches his hand. If you choose to ignore them that is up to you. But don't fucking say other people lie to suit their opinion then.

Strange that because if there’s a single shot of the ball hitting Dick Van’s arm then you are talking bollocks....

Is there?

 

[ballinio]

We’ve had a few decisions in our favour. Encroachment called twice against West Ham and Wolves both Pen’s missed originally but scored when retaken only because of VAR. Plus Mahrez pen at Wolves in the first place off the top of my head! Then Shef Utd last night!!

We’ve had a couple of dodgy ones too no doubt, but its not all one way

Lol

 

[ScottSinclair]

Strange that because if there’s a single shot of the ball hitting Dick Van’s arm then you are talking bollocks....

Is there?

A video was posted on here showing the whole incident from when he receives the ball to his pass. It looks pretty conclusive that it didn't hit his hand.

The point though is that people on here will see whatever the fuck they want. It used you to be United. Now its Liverpool.

Change the fucking record

 

[ballinio]

A video was posted on here showing the whole incident from when he receives the ball to his pass. It looks pretty conclusive that it didn't hit his hand.

The point though is that people on here will see whatever the fuck they want. It used you to be United. Now its Liverpool.

Change the fucking record

Why are fans of all the other clubs seeing the same thing then ?