Make them instal them if it means loosing seats so be itEven better show it on the big screens so the ref can decide and the crowd can see it as well,oh wait the rags and dippers don't have screens,i'm still waiting to be told why
I stil don't know why var is being used when they don't have screens in,haven't seen anyone in football media ask why they don't have to have them,can you imagine if it was us not having one,football would be posponed till we put one inMake them instal them if it means loosing seats so be it
The monitors are used in the cl perfectly fine and quick,we were told by swasbrick the var checks were going to be done in real time which is a lie,if they can't decide replaying it for 3-4 mins then the ref should check it himself
Don't need screens for VAR just cameras, nothing is shown on screen other than "VAR CHECK IN PROGRESS -POSSIBLE PENALTY" we don't get replays in the stadium, not even screen shots.I stil don't know why var is being used when they don't have screens in
I get that but screens are part of the system and var might evolve to showing how the decision has been made,probably not but you never know,still there is no excuse for not having them when everyone else has toDon't need screens for VAR just cameras, nothing is shown on screen other than "VAR CHECK IN PROGRESS -POSSIBLE PENALTY" we don't get replays in the stadium, not even screen shots.
I think fans would welcome more responsibilty on the refs,no-one is trusting the var refs in a box who get no come back on their decisions and can manipulate thingsthat’s fair enough.
I just suspect it would no go down well with majority of fan base
You will now be labeled by what I call them the "establishment boys/girls" of this forum;Offsides should be taken out of the VAR remit , the officials at Stockley park can manipulate when the ball leaves the foot , frame by frame , millisecond by millisecond , they are bascically deciding who wins games , along with titles and relegation , and its a disgrace that the VAR official is not requested to justify his decisions. The favouritism some teams have enjoyed this season is conclusive proof that the game is bent , as mentioned many times before a Dipperpool title win is great for the Premier league brand and the PGMOL are only too happy to provide it , with no fear of repercussion.
I get that but screens are part of the system and var might evolve to showing how the decision has been made,probably not but you never know,still there is no excuse for not having them when everyone else has to
If it does then I expect they'll be told to, but currently I don't think there is any rule that says you have to have a big screen at a stadium, just that the dinosaurs don't have them, it wouldn't surprise me if its one of the reasons fans in the stadium don't see the replay, because not all grounds are capable of doing it.I get that but screens are part of the system and var might evolve to showing how the decision has been made,probably not but you never know,still there is no excuse for not having them when everyone else has to
No.i agree and said this two years ago.Just as they do over in the states,its all going one way...who cares about the fan in the stadium? Make them wait before celebrating..and advertise more to the viewers at home,filling that var gap with more money spinning commercials.whats not to like.?I am just waiting for the tele to start showing adverts whilst VAR make their decision. Soon they will not be able to announce it until the advert (Bet365, Foxy Bingo, Sky Bet) has finished.
You think I'm joking ?
Here's my theory on extra time.Extra time thing I’ve mentioned aswell, I’ve always known games to add on little for the first half despite loads of stoppages and end of the game they seem to always add more on. I have no idea why.
If it does then I expect they'll be told to, but currently I don't think there is any rule that says you have to have a big screen at a stadium, just that the dinosaurs don't have them, it wouldn't surprise me if its one of the reasons fans in the stadium don't see the replay, because not all grounds are capable of doing it.
The prob with that is offsides are the area where most mistakes are made, so they should stay in VAROffsides should be taken out of the VAR remit , the officials at Stockley park can manipulate when the ball leaves the foot , frame by frame , millisecond by millisecond , they are bascically deciding who wins games , along with titles and relegation , and its a disgrace that the VAR official is not requested to justify his decisions. The favouritism some teams have enjoyed this season is conclusive proof that the game is bent , as mentioned many times before a Dipperpool title win is great for the Premier league brand and the PGMOL are only too happy to provide it , with no fear of repercussion.
Rugby league games in Australia HAVE to have reviews of incidents so that they can show a Burger King advert (or other fast food outlet) on the big screen while he review takes place.I am just waiting for the tele to start showing adverts whilst VAR make their decision. Soon they will not be able to announce it until the advert (Bet365, Foxy Bingo, Sky Bet) has finished.
You think I'm joking ?
Yep .Here's my theory on extra time.
I reckon that makes perfect sense. To hell with the match going fan they do not enter into any debate on the future of football.
- First Half - Can not delay the adverts so not too much added.
- Second Half- Try and keep the TV audience for as long as possible.
Just wait until they introduce compulsary time-outs on 22.5 minutes and 67.5 minutes, excusing it as the players needing to rehydrate. But it will be actually to cram in another 3 to 5 minutes of adverts.
seems rather odd that the use of VAR in todays cup games will depend where you are drawn. If its a tie at a PL ground where they have VAR its in operation - if not then its not - surely for consistency if it can't be used across the board it should be switched off?