give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,425
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Why not have the same refs doing VAR than all the time, we might get continuity....4 or 5 refs?
Hahaha. Love this post.Football to me like a recent girlfriend that you pop round and have sex with because you are at a loose end, the game has changed and I don't recognise it. Fans should walk away from it and force the engineers to rethink their slow strangulation of the sport that captures/captured the imagination of billions.
Popcorn, mild humming instead of singing, Jamie bloody Oliver food and to top it all a clear and obvious bias by VAR to award the title to their darlings in red.
There is a general feeling among City fans that the explanation from the PL that you have given here about players putting their hands down will be looked at differently in other games involving other teams. We have seen the Van Dijk penal offence on Calvert-Lewin to be identical to the one for which Sissoko was penalised. One given, the other not - Identical situations except for different feet. Stepping on someone's foot and tripping them is a penal offence. We had one on Silva earlier in the season that even Old Mother Riley came out and said was a VAR mistake in not being awarded. As you say, the law re that kind of offence when a defender falls over and the ball hits their arm will not be interpreted across the PL in an identical manner. The ref on VAR duty at Stockley will interpret that differently next week! If it ends up as a pen next week, why not a pen last week!
Why not have the same refs doing VAR than all the time, we might get continuity....4 or 5 refs?
Mate, decisions go against all teams. There’s no conspiracy set up to stop City.
Last season, Liverpool could point to a red card not given to Kompany in the biggest game of the season amongst other decisions...
I think they get it wrong a lot, and sometimes some sides go through tougher spells with decisions, but to suggest they’re acting differently to stop City winning the league is mad.
You don’t watch all our games so you have no clue , it’s easy to post like you do when you get every decision going Var was invented for Liverpool , you can’t win the league without it.Mate, decisions go against all teams. There’s no conspiracy set up to stop City.
Last season, Liverpool could point to a red card not given to Kompany in the biggest game of the season amongst other decisions...
I think they get it wrong a lot, and sometimes some sides go through tougher spells with decisions, but to suggest they’re acting differently to stop City winning the league is mad.
Mate, decisions go against all teams. There’s no conspiracy set up to stop City.
Last season, Liverpool could point to a red card not given to Kompany in the biggest game of the season amongst other decisions...
I think they get it wrong a lot, and sometimes some sides go through tougher spells with decisions, but to suggest they’re acting differently to stop City winning the league is mad.
Mate, decisions go against all teams. There’s no conspiracy set up to stop City.
Last season, Liverpool could point to a red card not given to Kompany in the biggest game of the season amongst other decisions...
I think they get it wrong a lot, and sometimes some sides go through tougher spells with decisions, but to suggest they’re acting differently to stop City winning the league is mad.
Mate, decisions go against all teams. There’s no conspiracy set up to stop City.
Last season, Liverpool could point to a red card not given to Kompany in the biggest game of the season amongst other decisions...
I think they get it wrong a lot, and sometimes some sides go through tougher spells with decisions, but to suggest they’re acting differently to stop City winning the league is mad.