The semi automated system wasn't down.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR Discussion Thread
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
IcriedwhenTueartleft
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,076
If it wasn't working then they HAD to stick with the on field decision, why the feck was that pillock Twatwell sitting staring at the screen for 5 minutes, absurd decision.
richardtheref
Well-Known Member
So why no animated picture? Why were we shown pictures of Attwell drawing the lines?The semi automated system wasn't down.
Where have you seen that it wasn't down ?
Certainly the bbc are reporting it was.
I ask because again it highlights how they con us. Two different reasons, it was broken/it was too congested.
This adds fuel to the conspiracy fires,there is no official statement, fuck the fans we can con them every time.
From BBC and The Guardian
"SAOT technology uses in-stadium cameras to build a live picture of the position of players on the field, before generating a 3D image that can be used by video assistant referees to assess offside calls. It is understood the system, the same as used in the Premier League, was unable to locate the position of the ball in the buildup to the Semenyo goal because it was obscured by surrounding players. Without a 3D image, VAR operatives were forced to revert to manually applying offside lines to video footage"
See post aboveSo why no animated picture? Why were we shown pictures of Attwell drawing the lines?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
The cartoon graphic they used to show Dias 'jumping' when in reality his feet were firmly planted?This isn’t correct. The tolerance level was introduced at the start of the ‘21-‘22 season. The ‘advantage’ of the old system, which was used last night, is there is a visual indication when the tolerance level is being used. The graphic produces just one line, instead of the two we saw last night.
SAOT has incorporated the tolerance level. But there’s no clue when they show their ‘cartoon’ graphic whether it has or hasn’t come into play.
That cartoon graphic?
Arsenal's first goal tonight.
The arsenal player is stood on the line but nothing is said, by anyone.
They said nowt because it was a good goal just like ours last night. The only difference was the 5+ minutes it took to fuck us over.
Bent.
The arsenal player is stood on the line but nothing is said, by anyone.
They said nowt because it was a good goal just like ours last night. The only difference was the 5+ minutes it took to fuck us over.
Bent.
bluemullet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 207
Amazing how similar both goals are. The glaring difference being the arse player being more obviously offside, yet a) their goal stands and b) it takes less than a minute. At least we are now getting some consistency. Consistently bent!Arsenal's first goal tonight.
The arsenal player is stood on the line but nothing is said, by anyone.
They said nowt because it was a good goal just like ours last night. The only difference was the 5+ minutes it took to fuck us over.
Bent.
richardtheref
Well-Known Member
So in affect it wasn't working at the critical momentSee post above
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
this aged wellHopefully they will now look more closely at Gabriel & company manhandling defenders at Arsenal corners.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
atleast ssn making issue of both goals within 24 hrs but turned it into joke and laugh without calling anyone out
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
though when last kickedFrom BBC and The Guardian
"SAOT technology uses in-stadium cameras to build a live picture of the position of players on the field, before generating a 3D image that can be used by video assistant referees to assess offside calls. It is understood the system, the same as used in the Premier League, was unable to locate the position of the ball in the buildup to the Semenyo goal because it was obscured by surrounding players. Without a 3D image, VAR operatives were forced to revert to manually applying offside lines to video footage"
i need rewatch see how congested it was im sure it was cross'shot into box
Maybe "working" but not fit for purposeSo in affect it wasn't working at the critical moment
Imagine a camera not working because the players are too close together. When the pointFrom BBC and The Guardian
"SAOT technology uses in-stadium cameras to build a live picture of the position of players on the field, before generating a 3D image that can be used by video assistant referees to assess offside calls. It is understood the system, the same as used in the Premier League, was unable to locate the position of the ball in the buildup to the Semenyo goal because it was obscured by surrounding players. Without a 3D image, VAR operatives were forced to revert to manually applying offside lines to video footage"
Of it is to look at offside decisions where players are too close together for the ref to tell…
Both Haaland and arsenal player deemed to be offside but, in our case, they claim Haaland was interfering in playAmazing how similar both goals are. The glaring difference being the arse player being more obviously offside, yet a) their goal stands and b) it takes less than a minute. At least we are now getting some consistency. Consistently bent!
Imagine if it was Liverpool not us who were on the shit end of those 2 decisions and imagine the difference in reporting and reaction.atleast ssn making issue of both goals within 24 hrs but turned it into joke and laugh without calling anyone out
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 20,387
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
It's ALWAYS an extraordinary explanation when it's ridiculous decisions against City.
lust overlord
Well-Known Member
It's inevitably going to be brushed under the carpet because we actually won.
I wonder who is on Var duty on Saturday?
I wonder who is on Var duty on Saturday?
The Wenger proposal is that there should be daylight in offside.There has never ever been a daylight rule. Something Andy Grey came out with aa fact but was never in the laws
Today's Guardian is discussing the Var farce especially in relation to the 5.30 minute delay for Semenyos second.....
"It is understood the system was unable to locate the ball in the buuld up to the Semenyo goal because it was obscured by surrounding players"
What the actual fuck, several million viewers knew exactly where the ball was, why couldn't a multi million pound system ?
It is clear a) City are treated differently* and b) we the fans are being lied to. If the system could not track that ball it is not fit for purpose.
*See Arsenal's first goal oast night.
"It is understood the system was unable to locate the ball in the buuld up to the Semenyo goal because it was obscured by surrounding players"
What the actual fuck, several million viewers knew exactly where the ball was, why couldn't a multi million pound system ?
It is clear a) City are treated differently* and b) we the fans are being lied to. If the system could not track that ball it is not fit for purpose.
*See Arsenal's first goal oast night.