big gaz
Well-Known Member
Also 54, in the ground and 2 Liners ;-) Its f**ked mate and you know it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR impact and consequence log - game 27
- Thread starter flook
- Start date
-
- Tags
- consequence impact lost points var
jimmygrimblesboots
Well-Known Member
Good idea for a thread but maybe the OP should also record the Dippers VAR favourable decisions , because there is going to be a massive inbalance by the end of the season , the Premier league have been looking for a way to stop our dominance and VAR is a god send to them
flook
Well-Known Member
Good idea for a thread but maybe the OP should also record the Dippers VAR favourable decisions , because there is going to be a massive inbalance by the end of the season , the Premier league have been looking for a way to stop our dominance and VAR is a god send to them
I do have a job you know, and a life :p
Good idea for a thread but maybe the OP should also record the Dippers VAR favourable decisions , because there is going to be a massive inbalance by the end of the season , the Premier league have been looking for a way to stop our dominance and VAR is a god send to them
Just the favourable ones for the Dippers though?! Perhaps you should start a thread in the general football forum and track them? I fear you will be disappointed at the lack of evidence to back your theory.
If we had that system the Jesus goal would almost certainly have still been chalked off. As far as I can remember Spurs didn’t have cause to use up two reviews earlier in the game so would still have had at least one review available so would have used it then because, why not?Yeah, we aren’t so far apart really. When VAR was mooted, I was of the view that reviews should take place on appeal and that appeals should be limited to, say, two per match. I think that’s similar to cricket. It rankles that every goal is subjected to forensic examination even when nobody (apparently) appealed against it.
In cricket it’s called “using up your reviews”. If the last batsman is given out lbw and the team still has a review they always use it.
So every late goal would be reviewed if the team conceding had a review left. Which could be quite an anti climax
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Fair points but you’d agree there would be fewer reviews overall? And that any vexatious team could leave their arse hanging out by using up their reviews too early?If we had that system the Jesus goal would almost certainly have still been chalked off. As far as I can remember Spurs didn’t have cause to use up two reviews earlier in the game so would still have had at least one review available so would have used it then because, why not?
In cricket it’s called “using up your reviews”. If the last batsman is given out lbw and the team still has a review they always use it.
So every late goal would be reviewed if the team conceding had a review left. Which could be quite an anti climax
Truth is I don’t know if it would work better but I’d like to have seen the system trialled.
I’m actually more unhappy with the current offside and handball interpretations than with VAR itself.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,878
Its killing the game.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,897
Its killing the game.
The delay at Spurs for the Newcastle goal was way too long. The crowd don’t know what to do. It’s certtaonly affecting the game for the match going fan that’s for sure as no one has a clue what is going on.
You understood him ?Had to laugh at Kane, going on about the penalty decision was hard to take....yeh right pal, we know all about that.