Looking at the highlights it was 50 seconds after the ball crossed the line before the liner raised his flag. Argument I have heard is that the liner wasn’t sure whether the ball was flicked on by a Chelsea defender which is what he discussed with Twatkinson. He then raised his flag so that as far as an assessor thought he had made the right decision. I don’t buy that but what other reason would the flag be raised 50 seconds after a goal has been scored?
I couldn't make that decision on behalf of my lad, but I don't know how old he is ?Me too.
800 for the season ticket, 500 for the lad, plus the petrol driving up every other week, plus food and drink to watch a corrupt competition?
Sorry City, Will always love you, but fuck it. I’m out.
I couldn't make that decision on behalf of my lad, but I don't know how old he is ?
It plainly is corrupt.
The premier league dishonestly tweeted that the decision to disallow sterling’s goal was an on field decision. It plainly was not. 50,000 people were there and none of them saw the liner put up his flag until about 30 after the stadium announcement that the scorer of city’s third was Raheem sterling.
When the premier league are telling blatant lies what would you call that other than corrupt?
If you accept that they are not telling the truth, you accept that they are corrupt. By definition. Corruption is trying to gain an advantage by dishonesty. Whether the advantage is to promote the brand or cover up incompetence is immaterial- it’s corrupt either way.
So then the question becomes is it incompetence when a push one week is ignored when a penalty for city is on the line but is grounds to chalk a goal off against a Liverpool? And is it incompetence when a goal is given, and no VAR imagery released, when Salah scores from an offside position, but when Sterling scores from an onside position, the goal is ruled out?
There is no corruption. We are all talking about Liverpool being given a advantage over us deliberately which is nonsense. vAR and the refs are incompetent right across the board and not just for certain teams, like I said Liverpool have had a couple of very dodgy VAR decisions go against them also.
Two examples from the Premier League where Liverpool have "suffered" VAR DECISIONS?There is no corruption. We are all talking about Liverpool being given a advantage over us deliberately which is nonsense. vAR and the refs are incompetent right across the board and not just for certain teams, like I said Liverpool have had a couple of very dodgy VAR decisions go against them also.
I'm not trying to tell you what to do, that between you and him, just saying I couldn't do it.You could if you were paying for his season ticket and the costs of travelling up every fortnight mate.
no they are fucking useless and are trying their best to defend their staff and product by coming out with excuses and lies every week.
There is no way there is corruption in this day and age with a billion eyes on one of the worlds biggest brands it would get exposed. We sound more and more like the rags every day. Liverpool have had VaR against them too, that firminho goal that got disallowed for that pathetic offside and that bad challenge at old Trafford that they let go are two off the top of my head
Mate, you’ve gone full dipper.
Never go full dipper.