Blue Theatre
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,706
Sheff Utd have had more goals ruled out by VAR than anyone ... today was the fifth time.
So they hate it as much as we do.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR impact and consequence log - game 27
- Thread starter flook
- Start date
-
- Tags
- consequence impact lost points var
Sheff Utd have had more goals ruled out by VAR than anyone ... today was the fifth time.
So they hate it as much as we do.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,724
Sheff Utd have had more goals ruled out by VAR than anyone ... today was the fifth time.
So they hate it as much as we do.
Yes there seemed a lot of empathy from our fans when they were singing it’s not football anymore and fuck VAR. I don’t blame them. It’s shit
Beyond Belief
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Mar 2016
- Messages
- 143
Helping us? By getting it right? Mahrez was fouled and Sheffield United's goal was correctly chalked off.2 games in a row where VAR is helping us and it can fuck off
By that logic the default position is City being robbed but once VAR actually does its job and gets key decisions correct, that's somehow "helping" us?
The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,485
YesHelping us? By getting it right? Mahrez was fouled and Sheffield United's goal was correctly chalked off.
By that logic the default position is City being robbed but once VAR actually does its job and gets key decisions correct, that's somehow "helping" us?
Well done Kris , taught him well when I was assessing him a few years back.Seriously VAR is shite and needs to go .can't blame them tbh. Very tight offside and the ref tackled their lad for our first
VAR ruling offsides with these dotted line seems highly dubious. They are giving rulings on millimetres which seems strange. My (albeit limited) knowledge is that video runs at around 50 frames per second if you are lucky. So if the attacker is running at the pace of 100 metres in 12 seconds means that 0.166 metres is as close as they can get.
That means that within 16cm is as precise as a tv camera still can show.
I may be wrong but if that is the case how can these VAR stills claim to be remotely accurate? That is even before we question the precise millisecond that the ball officially leaves the would be assist players foot.
If anyone works in video I would love to know if I have it completely wrong? If not it’s completely subjective to the clowns in the booth.
That means that within 16cm is as precise as a tv camera still can show.
I may be wrong but if that is the case how can these VAR stills claim to be remotely accurate? That is even before we question the precise millisecond that the ball officially leaves the would be assist players foot.
If anyone works in video I would love to know if I have it completely wrong? If not it’s completely subjective to the clowns in the booth.
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 4,031
So what`s your view of Walkers foul that set up Wolves second, and Adama`s foul that VAR decided was okay? and the two hand balls by the Blades which under the new rules were both penalties, strange how VAR can look at the same incident and choose what it wants to implement
Sheff Utd definitely got screwed over today, as tight a call for the offside as anything that we’ve had and for our goal it didn't touch the ref but he clearly causes the guy to lose possession. I suppose the agenda now changes to “they’re just evening it out now it doesn’t matter so much to disguise the fact that every single person is out to get City”
Stop fabricating facts to help you prove a point.
It was offside. The ref didn't get in the way and the goal correctly stood.