ultimateharold
Well-Known Member
I might be missing something, but from 325 their goal was offside in real time, and goal line tech didn't give the header, so today, it worked fine.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR impact and consequence log - game 27
- Thread starter flook
- Start date
-
- Tags
- consequence impact lost points var
There's also the fact it's impossible to tell exactly when the ball is played.VAR ruling offsides with these dotted line seems highly dubious. They are giving rulings on millimetres which seems strange. My (albeit limited) knowledge is that video runs at around 50 frames per second if you are lucky. So if the attacker is running at the pace of 100 metres in 12 seconds means that 0.166 metres is as close as they can get.
That means that within 16cm is as precise as a tv camera still can show.
I may be wrong but if that is the case how can these VAR stills claim to be remotely accurate? That is even before we question the precise millisecond that the ball officially leaves the would be assist players foot.
If anyone works in video I would love to know if I have it completely wrong? If not it’s completely subjective to the clowns in the booth.
On another note it seems extremely strange that VVD's handball in the build-up to LiVARpool's goal today wasn't classed as "conclusive". The exact same lack of "conclusive" evidence was deemed enough to be used to rule out Jesus goal against Spurs when Laporte allegedly handballed it.
The Premier League is bent as fuck and this season it's been proved beyond any doubt with VAR being used as an additional tool to manipulate the results to favour certain teams.
That's what I originaly thought VAR was looking at not offsideIMO their offside goal should’ve been pulled back for a foul on Aguero on the right wing regardless of whether they were onside, they only managed to break because Aguero was wrestled off the ball
flook
Well-Known Member
To me the so-called "armpit offside" issue can be easily resolved by reverting to the originally stated strategy of VAR being used to over rule clear and obvious errors. If you have to draw lines, its not obvious, therefore VAR shuts the fuck up, simple.
Well we know there will be change in the Summer, however it sounds like VAR will remain in place and the handball and offside rules will be changed.
I would completely scrap it with a view to bringing tech back in the future for black and white decisions such as offside.
The arguments have been won and opinion is now anti-VAR but how much change is football going to make? Watching Liverpool has now become laughable. They have a fantastic side but their fans don't realise that in years to come, their achievements this season are going to be questioned and slightly discredited. City fans have been feeling it every match-day as we scrutinise their games but we're not the only ones; there are Liverpool's opponents too.
I would completely scrap it with a view to bringing tech back in the future for black and white decisions such as offside.
The arguments have been won and opinion is now anti-VAR but how much change is football going to make? Watching Liverpool has now become laughable. They have a fantastic side but their fans don't realise that in years to come, their achievements this season are going to be questioned and slightly discredited. City fans have been feeling it every match-day as we scrutinise their games but we're not the only ones; there are Liverpool's opponents too.
They made a rod for their back when they changed the referee rule (if it hits the ref you get possession back). If they had kept it as the referee is part of the field of play and tough shit if he gets in the way then there would be no argument.
They changed a law that worked perfectly well as it was.
They changed a law that worked perfectly well as it was.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Sheff Utd definitely got screwed over today, as tight a call for the offside as anything that we’ve had and for our goal it didn't touch the ref but he clearly causes the guy to lose possession. I suppose the agenda now changes to “they’re just evening it out now it doesn’t matter so much to disguise the fact that every single person is out to get City”
they did get screwed over, but it wasn't the LotG or VAR who screwed them - it was MCFC!
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
That’s The way its been brought in. So the cheats at Stockley Park can interpret how they wish to suit their scam.So what`s your view of Walkers foul that set up Wolves second, and Adama`s foul that VAR decided was okay? and the two hand balls by the Blades which under the new rules were both penalties, strange how VAR can look at the same incident and choose what it wants to implement