BertTrautmann'sParachute
Well-Known Member
I can see VAR making things more corrupt at this rate. Ruling stuff out for certain teams and ignoring the same incidents for those not favoured.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR (PL introduction 2019)
- Thread starter greasedupdeafguy
- Start date
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
I can see VAR making things more corrupt at this rate. Ruling stuff out for certain teams and ignoring the same incidents for those not favoured.
That will be the only use for VAR. I can't believe people can't see it. It just gives the officials a second chance to manipulate the game.
With Var we have had tonight and 2 penalties against Burton reviewed and not given despite being penalties. Then you have Ajax having a good goal ruled out by Var against Madrid and Taylor on Var not giving 2 penalties to Chelsea after review for blatant shirt pulling and ripping and holding by Smalling last weekend. Then the delay tonight after our 1st goal where they were desperate to find something to rule it out. It will be used to protect certain teams
Luddite_Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 743
With that 1st penalty in some ways it was the ideal situation for VAR in that the ref can see it for himself with his own eyes, get a word in his ear to say you may want to look at it again and then review it on a monitor.
However, if the fookin monitor isn't working then how can VAR be brought into it. Surely it has to be the case that he then says I'd like to look at a monitor but as it's not working I'll stand by the original decision that I made with my own eyes. Otherwise it raises the question of who made the actual decision and who is reffing the game.
However, if the fookin monitor isn't working then how can VAR be brought into it. Surely it has to be the case that he then says I'd like to look at a monitor but as it's not working I'll stand by the original decision that I made with my own eyes. Otherwise it raises the question of who made the actual decision and who is reffing the game.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Walton is making a complete cnut of himself.
So if you’re in an offside position going toward the ball, but your team mate is fouled, you get a penalty.
Can’t see that being applied FOR us.
Well from the English version I saw the lines across the pitch weren’t even straight. Then again - look at the numpties working on it - Chris Foy is involved - he couldn’t run a bath.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
ThisWith Var we have had tonight and 2 penalties against Burton reviewed and not given despite being penalties. Then you have Ajax having a good goal ruled out by Var against Madrid and Taylor on Var not giving 2 penalties to Chelsea after review for blatant shirt pulling and ripping and holding by Smalling last weekend. Then the delay tonight after our 1st goal where they were desperate to find something to rule it out. It will be used to protect certain teams
nmc
Well-Known Member
This
I remember a few in the WC - the pricks in the van looked at things twenty times - and got it wrong quite often. Let’s face it you could give Lee Mason or Jonathan Moss a month and they’d still get it wrong much of the time.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Thing is, the more u slow thingsdown, the more youre convinced youve seen something.I remember a few in the WC - the pricks in the van looked at things twenty times - and got it wrong quite often. Let’s face it you could give Lee Mason or Jonathan Moss a month and they’d still get it wrong much of the time.
With Var we have had tonight and 2 penalties against Burton reviewed and not given despite being penalties. Then you have Ajax having a good goal ruled out by Var against Madrid and Taylor on Var not giving 2 penalties to Chelsea after review for blatant shirt pulling and ripping and holding by Smalling last weekend. Then the delay tonight after our 1st goal where they were desperate to find something to rule it out. It will be used to protect certain teams
Anyone who thinks otherwise are in for a serious shock.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Thing is, the more u slow thingsdown, the more youre convinced youve seen something.
Yeah particularly if you have an agenda.
Postman Pep
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2018
- Messages
- 5,698
Not a lot has been been made of this so far blatant misuse of VARWith that 1st penalty in some ways it was the ideal situation for VAR in that the ref can see it for himself with his own eyes, get a word in his ear to say you may want to look at it again and then review it on a monitor.
However, if the fookin monitor isn't working then how can VAR be brought into it. Surely it has to be the case that he then says I'd like to look at a monitor but as it's not working I'll stand by the original decision that I made with my own eyes. Otherwise it raises the question of who made the actual decision and who is reffing the game.
kippaxking79
Well-Known Member
I can see why we were big advocates for it in the premier league as opposed to Liverpool whom were against it.
Looking back on tonight I think it's a bad idea from our point of view. Like others have said - we have had loads of clear cut decisions go against us in the past, but after tonight it's the decisions that they can "manipulate" to go against US (in oppositions favour) that scares me. It will be used as an extra tool to fuck us over IMO.
Looking back on tonight I think it's a bad idea from our point of view. Like others have said - we have had loads of clear cut decisions go against us in the past, but after tonight it's the decisions that they can "manipulate" to go against US (in oppositions favour) that scares me. It will be used as an extra tool to fuck us over IMO.
City_Sean
Well-Known Member
I can see why we were big advocates for it in the premier league as opposed to Liverpool whom were against it.
Looking back on tonight I think it's a bad idea from our point of view. Like others have said - we have had loads of clear cut decisions go against us in the past, but after tonight it's the decisions that they can "manipulate" to go against US (in oppositions favour) that scares me. It will be used as an extra tool to fuck us over IMO.
Sorry but I don't see tonight being this big UEFA conspiracy. It's been criticised widely in Serie A too.
It's not perfect at the moment but it will get better.
M
M
mat
Guest
Fatty Moss will have taken some tips from tonight's match to prepare for Sunday.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Ive watched the handball pen countless times now and for me it IS NOT a penalty. Hes clearly trying to pull his hand out of the way.
Im not saying there is some huge conspiracy, but i do think, as has always been the case, that certain teams will benefit more from VAR than others.
Im not saying there is some huge conspiracy, but i do think, as has always been the case, that certain teams will benefit more from VAR than others.
city saint
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 6,696
you only have to hear Walton to see they arnt fit for purposeI remember a few in the WC - the pricks in the van looked at things twenty times - and got it wrong quite often. Let’s face it you could give Lee Mason or Jonathan Moss a month and they’d still get it wrong much of the time.
Yep boys are going to have to assume losing 1 nil at kick offI can see why we were big advocates for it in the premier league as opposed to Liverpool whom were against it.
Looking back on tonight I think it's a bad idea from our point of view. Like others have said - we have had loads of clear cut decisions go against us in the past, but after tonight it's the decisions that they can "manipulate" to go against US (in oppositions favour) that scares me. It will be used as an extra tool to fuck us over IMO.