FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
They shouldn't have to,as it should not be getting anything wrong.It’s getting loads right - but no one mentions that.
They shouldn't have to,as it should not be getting anything wrong.It’s getting loads right - but no one mentions that.
What a specious argument. VAR shouldn't get any wrong
This is a mute point. They no longer are putting their decision making on the line. In cricket the umpiring is getting worse because they can now rely on reviews. The infield decision making is affected by the VAR safety net. Would they have made/not made the same decisions without VAR in the background?It got loads right over weekend - the Arsenal penalty which the ref wouldn’t have given. mounts goal which VAR correctly called onside. It’s getting loads right - but no one mentions that.
Speciousthe argument is without VAR there’s way more decisions wrong.
Do you think so ? Dips v us the other week. If Milner was sent off in the first half the sky main event would have been ruined.That's taking the conspiracy theory to a whole new level !
See the wet spam fan hasn't answered my question as to why VAR didn't call offside for the Brighton penalty..
Fkin lol..Not seen it.
Can you answer why the ref didn’t give the blatant Arsenal penalty the other night ?
I tell you why. CORRUPTION BLA BLA!
The classic not seen it but look over hereNot seen it.
Can you answer why the ref didn’t give the blatant Arsenal penalty the other night ?
I tell you why. CORRUPTION BLA BLA!
The hole he's dug for himself just gets deeper and deeper..!The classic not seen it but look over here