He was onside….
let it go for a throw in point gainedyep onside.
My fellow hammers fans full of the usual - VAR designed to help the top 6’’ it’s all corrupt ‘’ bla bla blah.
why not scrap the VAR and just tell the Lino’s to flag anything off ? Be a lot easier.
onside. We lost. Life goes on.
Hopefully we’ll have GPT3 AI commentating in the next few years...The pair commentating on my thread were insistent straight away that it was not a red, maintained this view even after many replays in slow time and the pundit whoever he was finished by saying it was 'only just a yellow'.
I didn't catch the views of the studio guests but no doubt he held the party line.
just take a look at this 39 secs in - they draw the VAR lines across the feet but if you look at the other line part of him is offside - we and many others have had a goal chalked off due to an elbow or an armpit being off yet oddly this...
Perspective my arse.Perspective
Its all about perspective. He was clearly onside, embarrassing to think otherwisePerspective my arse.
The ball is still at Martial's feet in that frame. The pass has not yet been made so why have they drawn the lines there?
It's a rhetorical question by the way.
Which one? The one this season where Milner takes him out at Anfield or the one last season where the keeper takes him out at Southampton? ;)When Var was being proposed we were told it was a current referee and a TV screen showing the incidents. When it started we were told the same.
Until Foden was taken down in the box and a penalty not given, no one had heard of a match commander.
To this day no one knows what his role and his authority is and perhaps more importantly who he is. The Foden non penalty clearly shows that he has the authority to over rule the referee and yet no one knows who he is. How is that right ?