Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 61,258
Is there anything in life that you aren’t cynical about?I see Sky is doing it’s bit by gaslighting us all into believing VAR is getting better and better lol.
Is there anything in life that you aren’t cynical about?I see Sky is doing it’s bit by gaslighting us all into believing VAR is getting better and better lol.
I was suggesting a reason WHY there might actually be a lack of evidence.10+ years ago? One example. Is this the basis for your wider conspiracy theory or do you have any other evidence?
Lol. You give Neville and Carragher too much credit.Because the co-commentators have a big say on how an incident is perceived. They give opinion, while the main commentator gives facts, and descriptive visualisations.
The opinion of the co-commentator can cause the refs serious issues if the weight of Public opinion is with them.
Neville and carragher absolutely know this and play up to what they (and their employers) want to see highlighted.
A classic example of this is the Mane assault on Ederson. Neville said "the game has gone" when Mane received a red card. He received the card, yes; but the talk afterwards, and til this day is it was not a red card.
If Neville had have said it was a blatant red and should be a long ban, this sending off would have been cast off into football history and not brought up again. But what you see is fans compering Haaland foot up challenge for the ball against Villa as in the same bracket as Mane's kung-fu kick.
So, you see. Var listening to commentary helps them feel the mood of a challenge. They also know that, especially in games involving Liverpool and Utd, any big decision going against them will be repeated, and repeated, and repeated on sky channels and in the press. They absolutely do not want bad press.
Remember the Aguero retrospective ban for a high elbow against a team (West Ham?) at the business end of the league season? Purely down to media intervention.
If you believe the media, the TV companies, the Premier league, and the red top teams don't circle wank each other, then you are surely deluded.
Yeah, ok. Maybe it’s just me struggling to find you objective because of your total bias.I was suggesting a reason WHY there might actually be a lack of evidence.
Is there anything in life that you aren’t cynical about?
The problem with using something like VAR to implement a 'strategic plan' is that if you make it too obvious, the game is up. That's how most cheats get caught. Either that of they run out of luck.Do you think the objectives are written on the walls of Stockley Park or do you think maybe what the former CEO said 5 years or so ago may not be relevant today?
It‘s not working in any case. We’ve won the league 4 out of 5.
The most commercially successful club won the league last season, seemingly in spite of VAR.
So no.If there is I will be sure to discuss it in the relevant thread ;-)
Awesome. VAR is corrupt, but not noticeably so.The problem with using something like VAR to implement a 'strategic plan' is that if you make it too obvious, the game is up. That's how most cheats get caught. Either that of they run out of luck.
You appear to be in the 'nobody can prove cheating so it must be okay' camp, and I have a different point of view. That isn't 'total bias'.Yeah, ok. Maybe it’s just me struggling to find you objective because of your total bias.
You get out of the wrong side of bed this morning? you do appear to be a bit tetchy.Awesome. VAR is corrupt, but not noticeably so.