VAR thread 2022/23

[dadnlad]

The first penalty came from VAR, but only because the ref, who was looking straight at it didn't give it for some inexplicable reason.

then wasted 2 minutes of time playing on

 

[BlueHammer85]

The spammers on, time to go.

 

[kaz7]

The spammers on, time to go.

Broken fucking record , not you x

 

[SebastianBlue]

@BlueHammer85 @Stephen230

Please provide reasonable explanations for the following (years in to VAR use, mind):

1) PL/FA/PGMOL refusal to share audio of officials during matches (the audio is already broadcast; this would be a near zero cost and technical change implementation).

2) Certain clubs (namely Liverpool and United) being allowed to have substantially different VAR supporting system setups, including fewer cameras leading to “blind spots” in VAR coverage, compared to other clubs in the league.

 

[BlueHammer85]

Broken fucking record , not you x

no different to you constantly sticking up for Harry and Meghan is it ? (like i do)

what's the point of a VAR thread if you can't debate points and can only scream and shout that it's all a conspiracy?

 

[BlueHammer85]

@BlueHammer85 @Stephen230

Please provide reasonable explanations for the following (years in to VAR use, mind):

1) PL/FA/PGMOL refusal to share audio of officials during matches (the audio is already broadcast; this would be a near zero cost and technical change implementation).

2) Certain clubs (namely Liverpool and United) being allowed to have substantially different VAR supporting system setups, including fewer cameras leading to “blind spots” in VAR coverage, compared to other clubs in the league.

If i answer anything i get accused of trolling, wum or being a broken record.

 

[kaz7]

no different to you constantly sticking up for Harry and Meghan is it ? (like i do)

what's the point of a VAR thread if you can't debate points and can only scream and shout that it's all a conspiracy?

Because you dont debate , you lecture and repeat yourself endlessly , you have no intention of giving any ground , it puts people off

 

[kaz7]

If i answer anything i get accused of trolling, wum or being a broken record.

Answer seb

 

[SebastianBlue]

If i answer anything i get accused of trolling, wum or being a broken record.

That’s a cop out, as you know there is no reasonable explanation for either of those situations.

The first costs the league and broadcasters nothing and substantially improves transparency and perceived integrity of the game.

The second is a textbook example of unfair competitive practices (which, in any other regulated industry, would eventually lead to legal and financial punishment).

I’ve never accused you of being a WUM, but I do think you are oddly obsessed with mental gymnastics to defend the indefensible. And I am not sure why, given you are a member of the class being taken advantage of.

Stockholm syndrome, perhaps?

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

@BlueHammer85 @Stephen230

Please provide reasonable explanations for the following (years in to VAR use, mind):

1) PL/FA/PGMOL refusal to share audio of officials during matches (the audio is already broadcast; this would be a near zero cost and technical change implementation).

2) Certain clubs (namely Liverpool and United) being allowed to have substantially different VAR supporting system setups, including fewer cameras leading to “blind spots” in VAR coverage, compared to other clubs in the league.

In a £multi-billion industry there is simply NO reasonable explanation for the above other than the preservation (by deception) of said £multi-billion industry.