VAR thread 2022/23

[deano ou812]

Give Simon Jordan some credit he’s calling out as well how are they making mistakes/errors,when its there in front of them ..

 

[GaudinoMotors]

The irony of Webb's catastrophic PR job last night - followed by 2 offside goals being allowed - for LiVarpool!

 

[Nellies left peg]

I am sure if Haaland had run blindly, without checking to see where Pickford was, and cleaned out the dirty punter, he would have been awarded a penalty for maintaining a “natural run”.

By the way, the ball was 4 yards beyond Haaland when Pickford “appears to reach for the ball”.

It’s just farcical what they come up with to legitimise these bad (corrupt) decisions.

Webb’s new program did and will serve the same purpose: showcase the less contentious decisions, ignore the more controversial ones, and try to legitimise the inconsistent, nonsensical officiating, in an attempt to obfuscate continual attempts to manipulate match results.

If Pickford reached for the ball from 4 yards away he would still be 3.75 yards short of it with his flappers,sorry , flippers

 

[Gazza]

If Pickford reached for the ball from 4 yards away he would still be 3.75 yards short of it with his flappers,sorry , flippers

I wonder what the outcome would have been if it had been an outfield player on Haaland and not the goalkeeper.

 

[deano ou812]

So according to Jim white on talksport Webb said you will never get perfection,we all know that,it’s the blatant and deliberate fuck ups that we want explained..

 

[Nellies left peg]

So Webb flaunting his way round the media showing one obvious handball is going to make us think VAR officials do a good job when we see shockers nearly every game is not going to change my mind that they are either not good enough or are bent

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Not often I agree with Murphy...

Well, if it were a choice between the shit show we've had upt o now and Danny Muppet gettng his hand on the tiller then I'd settle for the current shit show, Webb 'n all!

 

[Eds]

Interesting to see how they generate the lines for offside and it's how we thought in that they select the frame they want manually which given the speed of players and the speed of frames per second from the camera it is easy to manipulate. Go forward one frame, go back one frame etc.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I am sure if Haaland had run blindly, without checking to see where Pickford was, and cleaned out the dirty punter, he would have been awarded a penalty for maintaining a “natural run”.

By the way, the ball was 4 yards beyond Haaland when Pickford “appears to reach for the ball”.

It’s just farcical what they come up with to legitimise these bad (corrupt) decisions.

Webb’s new program did and will serve the same purpose: showcase the less contentious decisions, ignore the more controversial ones, and try to legitimise the inconsistent, nonsensical officiating, in an attempt to obfuscate continual attempts to manipulate match results.

I remember a game at the Etihad v Wolves where Kevin Dillon was chasing a ball inside our area, closely followed by Joleon. The former stopped running and let Joleon clatter into him. Penalty!

Pickford has pushed Haarland to the ground. Penalty! Just another this season that refs were programmed not to give.

 

[Stato]

Interesting to see how they generate the lines for offside and it's how we thought in that they select the frame they want manually which given the speed of players and the speed of frames per second from the camera it is easy to manipulate. Go forward one frame, go back one frame etc.

was always going to be that, the cameras they use are not good enough to get it spot on, which is fine but there needs to be a margin of error when drawing the lines to equate for this but there isn't.

the goal line tech is far superior but that still has a margin of error.