VAR thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nascent Blues said:
I asked you a question and you tried to answer it like a politician, in that you tried not to answer it. When you did, you tripped over your own poor thought process.
Click to expand...
Ok, you win.

I’ll get on with life, accepting the decision and moving on to the next game.

Hope you can get some sleep tonight.

Literally no one outside of City fans (and Carragher) have an issue with this decision.

Its because it was wrong in the first place.
 
Blue Mist said:
OK Mr Tash, first ... I never advocated a one or three match ban. I saw an out of control foul, let someone else decide how many matches.
The referee agreed with me..... until Var intervened.
I said 2 feet were off the ground and he was out of control. The Premier League and pigmob stated 2 feet off the ground and out of control was a red so they like the referee today agreed with me.
Please explain where I am wrong ?
Click to expand...
Please don't feed the troll....
 
Paladin said:
You're not on your own @BlueHammer85. Many people on here agree with a lot of the points you make. Many disagree too, but that's what debate is all about. If some people are unable to keep it civil, then that's their problem, and it's a mark against their character, not yours.

Please don't be put off by the vocal, bullying minority. Your opinions are absolutely necessary, and help to give this topic some much needed balance.
Click to expand...

Thanks mate and cheers for the other nice comments.

There’s little point debating with BlueMist and a couple others here - I can and have posted well thought out balanced constructed point of views and criticised VAR on many occasions - but it’s never going to sit with someone who is convinced it’s all a conspiracy and won’t hear anything else - it’s like arguing with anti vaxxers , plus he has to keep up with his own angry online persona on here.

It’s clear, they will go mad for any decision that doesn’t go City’s way and be quiet for decisions that do go City’s way- same for most fans to be fair. We all wear our rose tinted specs from time to time.

As mentioned before, I’ll respond if I’m tagged in and it’s not some angry abusive post - if not I’ll stay clear and leave them to it
 
Last edited:
Alan Harper's Tash said:
They make the decision on clear and obvious errors, not the Bluemoon kangaroo court.
Click to expand...
In the Walker incident 'they' decided it was C&O, not me. And here's where I have a problem with that because there are incidents week-in-week-out where 'clear and obvious' is applied differently, and the fact that decisions are shrouded in secrecy leaves it wide open to accusations of corrupt intent and cheating.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
In the Walker incident 'they' decided it was C&O, not me. And here's where I have a problem with that because there are incidents week-in-week-out where 'clear and obvious' is applied differently, and the fact that decisions are shrouded in secrecy leaves it wide open to accusations of corrupt intent and cheating.
Click to expand...
Which is why I suggest they drop the wording clear and obvious and just ref each incident as they see it. If the ref and VAR disagree, they go to the screen and discuss the ruling.

Then there aren’t 10,000 posts on social media debating how clear clear is and how obvious obvious is.


This is the thing we are debating at the moment, isn’t it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.