When Garth Crooks says both were penalties, you know they both were.Dunk missed the ball and took out Bernie. Bernie may of well been cute, but if you miss the ball and wipe the player out it is a pen for me.
The standard of refereeing pre VAR was a disgraceThe standard of refereeing before VAR was not inconsistent and downright farcical though!
All of the inconsistencies that we're experiencing nowadays are due to VAR. The changes to the law (i.e. handball) are all VAR-induced changes that have created confusion. Before VAR, we all somehow knew what a handball was and the understanding of what a handball was required a sophistication and experience of being familiar with the sport. So a Father would be able to explain what a handball was to his son, who wouldn't know right way that sometimes if it hit the hand it wasn't a handball.
All of that sophistication for how fans knew the sport, how the laws made sense and just little things that fans knew from watching football all their lives has all completely gone up in smoke with VAR.
This has become like an entire new sport under VAR with no sense of what anything is anymore. We knew what a handball was before VAR. That didn't need to be changed, it only was changed to accommodate VAR. We knew (generally speaking) what warranted a yellow card or a red card. Now it's like a yellow card or a red card can be anything, depending on what side of the bed the referee and the VAR goons woke up on. So lets not fall into this trap of "well now we need VAR because the refereeing has become so bad". It's only gotten as bad as it has as a direct result of VAR!!
The people in the VAR both are the same incompetent people who ref games. Why anybody thought it would ever make anything better beggars belief.The standard of refereeing pre VAR was a disgrace
The standard of refereeing pre VAR was a disgrace
Being a referee without VAR was a lot easier for them to do their job. There were no distractions, there was no one in your ear telling you to second guess your decisions throughout the match. There was no running over to a monitor to force you into obsessing over subjective decisions and engaging in group think.I think it’s just impossible for one man and a couple lino’s to deal with so many decisions at a ridiculous speed with so many players cheating and diving everywhere not to mention the crowd appealing for everything etc - being a ref is a tough job and without VAR help it’s even tougher as they are forced to make decisions they’re not even sure about
Whilst it’s fair for people not to want VAR and scrap it completely- they have short memories if they really think without VAR officiating is any better
Nice to see nothings changed. Not.The standard of refereeing pre VAR was a disgrace
Yes another penalty we would not have got from the officials tonight
So Anfield last week and tonight … 2 stonewall penalty’s the refs would not have gave, thanks to VAR we got the correct decisions
Controversy for the Zouma goal, I was there and couldn’t tell so not seen that incident - hear Bournemouth manager not happy though
You're wasting your time. I've read various media reports about the farce last night and whilst it should be another nail in the coffin of var, it won't be.Both West Ham goals were farcical.
The first was blatant hand ball that should have ended any claim.The second was comical given the defender was about two foot away and sliding in to prevent a cross.....where the fuck was he meant to put his arms?
This slowing down of every incident and taking it out of context is misinterpreting play and the reality of a situation.VAR should be judged using real time,anything else is false.