I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,342
I know I always feel luxurious every time I drink a bottle of Volvic.Besides, choosing to pay for something that is available for free is the definition of luxury isn’t it?
I know I always feel luxurious every time I drink a bottle of Volvic.Besides, choosing to pay for something that is available for free is the definition of luxury isn’t it?
Do you think it should?
Besides, choosing to pay for something that is available for free is the definition of luxury isn’t it?
Those that enter politics just compounds my point, no? They're not in their positions because they are intellectual titans, they are there because they have the asterisk (Eton or equivalent) next to their names. The prestige of their education slickened their career traction, not the quality of the teaching they received. Someone brought up Johnson; the perfect example. Ironically enough, if he had been state educated I think he'd have turned out a much better, emotionally intelligent human being. Sound parenting is key; with a foundation of sound parenting any child's learning can be entrusted to the state.For most careers it probably doesn't make a huge difference.
For the ones with power; politics, senior lawyers, senior civil servants, journalists - it's "curious" how much of a difference it makes.
Maybe "most" was unfair. But if I were to ever have kids and the wherewithal to pay for their private education, I'd rather put my 30k pa in a trust fund ready for adulthood. A privately educated child could go on to become a world-leading scientist, or a coke-addled banker that ends up homeless; in the instance of the latter, ~250k being available as a safety net is much better than ~250k pissed away on private education.Bar the last sentence you’re spot on IMHO
Absolutely - I wasn't totally joking when I posted earlier that private education is actually a burden, which the taxpayer should be compensated generously for. Not sure how many billions the private education sector should be paying us in compensation for a fuckwit like Boris Johnson, but not sure any amount was worth it :/Those that enter politics just compounds my point, no? They're not in their positions because they are intellectual titans, they are there because they have the asterisk (Eton or equivalent) next to their names. The prestige of their education slickened their career traction, not the quality of the teaching they received. Someone brought up Johnson; the perfect example. Ironically enough, if he had been state educated I think he'd have turned out a much better, emotionally intelligent human being. Sound parenting is key; with a foundation of sound parenting any child's learning can be entrusted to the state.
On the matter of taxing these private institutions, it would only be worthy if every penny taxed was redistributed to state education, and not stashed away in the coffers for "austerity" or some vanity project a decade down the road. Suffice to say, I wouldn't hold hope of such redistribution happening.
I left school in 1968.Do private schools teach home economics?
I feel education went to shit when we stopped teaching kids how to darn socks, change plugs, make fire and basic cooking skills
Girls did home economics and cooking when I was at school in the 70s. Boys did woodwork, metalwork and tech drawing.I left school in 1968.
Was never taught any of those.
So just when were they part of the curriculum?
late 80s early 90s in my schoolI left school in 1968.
Was never taught any of those.
So just when were they part of the curriculum?