not really,Robbo. said:Paulmcfc2703 said:Yeah Given, Bellamy, Sylvinho and now Vieira. They are no benefit to us at all ;)
20 April 1976 (1976-04-20) (age 33) Shay Given is at a good age for a keeper!!
July 13, 1979 (1979-07-13) (age 30) Craig is now at his peak in his carer and said he’s looking at retiring in a couple of years as he will be past it, his words
April 12, 1974 (1974-04-12) (age 35) Sylvinho, yeah mate what’s your point the guys is well passed his best and against the better teams in this league e.g. Spurs he was embarrassing, my point proven don’t you think?
Paulmcfc2703 said:not really,Robbo. said:20 April 1976 (1976-04-20) (age 33) Shay Given is at a good age for a keeper!!
July 13, 1979 (1979-07-13) (age 30) Craig is now at his peak in his carer and said he’s looking at retiring in a couple of years as he will be past it, his words
April 12, 1974 (1974-04-12) (age 35) Sylvinho, yeah mate what’s your point the guys is well passed his best and against the better teams in this league e.g. Spurs he was embarrassing, my point proven don’t you think?
Some thought the Given move was wrong as he was old and would hold back hart.
Many were against the bellamy move because he was past it and injury prone.
We need experiance as well as youth and Vieira has won almost everything. For a free transfer he is a fantastic signing. The way you are going on its as if we are doing a Bolton and only signing old players.
Moratti has said he cannot give Jose any money for signings, Vieira is one of the big earners, he has 6 months on his contract, we didnt want to pay a fee for him so they cancel his contract rather than just loan him to us.Robbo. said:Paulmcfc2703 said:not really,
Some thought the Given move was wrong as he was old and would hold back hart.
Many were against the bellamy move because he was past it and injury prone.
We need experiance as well as youth and Vieira has won almost everything. For a free transfer he is a fantastic signing. The way you are going on its as if we are doing a Bolton and only signing old players.
all im saying its a shit first signing too old and passed his best, If Inter don’t want him then why the fuck would we want him??......they didn’t even want any money for him. Come on you tell me that sounds good? Please don’t come back and say well its a good deal for a squad player as well because if he was any good Inter would of said that we can fuck of because he’s a valuable squad player and you are not having him for free! City are the richest club in the world and when we come calling you think you could get at least 2/3M for his surly its business sense?.
Vitek said:£100k a week.is this a joke?
Vitek said:£100k a week.is this a joke?
Paulmcfc2703 said:Moratti has said he cannot give Jose any money for signings, Vieira is one of the big earners, he has 6 months on his contract, we didnt want to pay a fee for him so they cancel his contract rather than just loan him to us.Robbo. said:all im saying its a shit first signing too old and passed his best, If Inter don’t want him then why the fuck would we want him??......they didn’t even want any money for him. Come on you tell me that sounds good? Please don’t come back and say well its a good deal for a squad player as well because if he was any good Inter would of said that we can fuck of because he’s a valuable squad player and you are not having him for free! City are the richest club in the world and when we come calling you think you could get at least 2/3M for his surly its business sense?.
Just because we have money doesnt mean we should just through it at everything.
Is it me or do we seem to be saying this every time we fuckin sign someone?C_T_I_D said:How about getting behind him rather than writing him off before he's even played a game for us?