You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Villa (H) Post Match Thread
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
Kippaxblue5
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 351
Added the Villa win to the LDgames 3 page - https://www.rtfract.com/Ldgames3.html
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I presume Waltons initial verdict was done in real time in which he just missed the fact that Mings played the ball (he'll be subject to camera angles, the same as us). More importantly (and something that the media all seem to skate over) is the fact that the ref, the assistant ref and the VAR officials (how many are there?) all decided that it was a good goal with no hesitation or needing 5 minutes to work out what happened. None of the City players seemed overly worried with nervous glances at the ref either, Villa players were maybe just complaining in hope.Gray said:
Just like Balotelli with “Little Scotty Parker”, our goal will be discussed ad infinitum on Sky/BT until they get the law changed.
As for that complete thick twat Walton, words escape me.
so funny hahahah in game time BTsports we are going over to ref walton ? verdict offside. goal should not have stood ?? on the spot reaction from a official that worked for years in england top league
after the final whistle back to the studio and lets go back to ref walton. the referee was right to give the goal because of the rule that states clearly mings played the ball ??
fuck me walton you have all the tools in bt-sports mock up VAR studio and could not see mings play the ball in the game hahahaahah fuck me he (mings) trapped it on his chest and then fucked up the control ?
bitter walton hates manchester city and was made to eat his words after the game. the pain on his face was a joy to behold ? all them everton away games he took charge vs city and give everton every fucking thing was worth the wait to see him finaly get rumbled
It was mistake by Mings, pure & simple.
If we were in 12th and out the the title chase nobody would have given a shit. Red bias again.I presume Waltons initial verdict was done in real time in which he just missed the fact that Mings played the ball (he'll be subject to camera angles, the same as us). More importantly (and something that the media all seem to skate over) is the fact that the ref, the assistant ref and the VAR officials (how many are there?) all decided that it was a good goal with no hesitation or needing 5 minutes to work out what happened. None of the City players seemed overly worried with nervous glances at the ref either, Villa players were maybe just complaining in hope.
It was mistake by Mings, pure & simple.
Having watched the game again we battered them and really should have been a 6-2 result.
Now fingers crossed turf moor is muddy as fuck, cuts up well and the dippers slip again
come-on-barney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 10,877
Me neither didn’t impact the game at all. Well except for fouling and throwing himself on the floor. Just don’t rate him, above average player that’s about it. Big fish in a small pond.Exactly this ...dont understand why so many on here fancy him for us
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,521
He was no more offside than when a player nicks off the keep, good morning Andy Dibble ;)
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
Another win, another clean sheet with the added bonus of rags/dipper urine hitting the mercury levels.
tommybooth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 5,332
Bernys celebration was fooking brill.
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Spot on. Was on facebook with rags last night who were not having it until i came up with this alternative scenario that they finally understood and silenced them.I presume Waltons initial verdict was done in real time in which he just missed the fact that Mings played the ball (he'll be subject to camera angles, the same as us). More importantly (and something that the media all seem to skate over) is the fact that the ref, the assistant ref and the VAR officials (how many are there?) all decided that it was a good goal with no hesitation or needing 5 minutes to work out what happened. None of the City players seemed overly worried with nervous glances at the ref either, Villa players were maybe just complaining in hope.
It was mistake by Mings, pure & simple.
I asked them if Mings (unaware Rodri was behind him) turned and passed back to the keeper, Rodri intercepts it and scores, is it a goal or is he offside? They replied it would be a goal because the ball was played by a Villa player not a Blue.
So I asked them to apply that same logic to the real scenario and asked what difference does it make?
It makes none.....
PistonBlue
Well-Known Member
Exactly, I don't get the fuss?don't what all the fuss is about, rodri is clearly onside when he nicks the ball off mings(2 villa full backs playing him on)
the rest is all moot