Villa v Scum Thread | Good luck Dunne (Merged)

Re: Dowd proves he is a RAG after only 15 mins of cup final

Bjorn said:
United had a case for a penalty to so all the conspiracy/corruption shit just makes us look stupid.

How did Rafael elbow him? wise up mate and watch the game rather than just being biased all the time. We all know who we wanted to win today but that doesn't mean we should tell lies about what we actually saw. Rafael challenged in the air unfairly, it was a free nothing more.

Decisions went to both teams, Villa got a penalty, United didn't. Vidic could have went off but didn't. It evened itself out.

I don't understand why fans like you think United only win because of Refs, it's football for fuck sake, there is no mafia at the top of the game deciding everything. It all evens out.


Listen RAG, don't mis-quote to try to justify your puerile post. For the sake of others, I am putting your original post below with MY answers to you. Now fook off back to Red Cafe....


Vidic:
He got away with it because it was the second minute, nothing else. If it was later on he would have been off, I guess the ref just thought it would end the match if he sent him off and a penalty was a sufficient punishment. To be honest If I was the ref I wouldn't have sent him off either, I would have just booked him and gave the pen. At the end of the day neutrals want to see a football match and the FA have to protect the interest in it, and not just see a one sided match.

PMSL. Bull.
Thanks for that tripe, 'Bjorn again RAG'.


I think the two Villa yellows were right decisions, Carrick should have been booked also, but It would have been very harsh for Rafael to get booked for challenging in the air like that.

You missed the elbow then - Specsavers have a deal on, I believe...

United had a case for a penalty to so all the conspiracy/corruption shit just makes us look stupid.

No - the only one looking stupid is YOU with your rag cafe mates.
 
Yet another trophy purchased by manure. This one when they bullied Everton into selling their prize asset against their will. No Wooney = mediocrity.
Rags - ££££ = prizes.
 
Rags really looked arsed about winning it, that dirty twat fletcher said it all "when we got city we were desperate to win the cup"
 
mat said:
Rags really looked arsed about winning it, that dirty twat fletcher said it all "when we got city we were desperate to win the cup"
The red nosed **** put a better team out for tyhe semi than the final
Not that they're bothered about Liddel Siddy of course...
 
Re: Dowd proves he is a RAG after only 15 mins of cup final

johnwaynebobbet said:
Bjorn said:
He got away with it because it was the second minute, nothing else. If it was later on he would have been off, I guess the ref just thought it would end the match if he sent him off and a penalty was a sufficient punishment. To be honest If I was the ref I wouldn't have sent him off either, I would have just booked him and gave the pen. At the end of the day neutrals want to see a football match and the FA have to protect the interest in it, and not just see a one sided match.

So rules dont apply then if the offence happens in the first few minutes of a match?
Bjorn no offence but what you said makes no sense at all. Like the earlier post said,"So rules dont apply then if the offence happens in the first few minutes of a match?" Answer that if you can mate:)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.