My post was a reply to
@Mon Autre ’s post, which didn’t seem to be a reply to any one person’s post (as he didn’t quote anyone else).
I was pointing out his analogy was incomplete, which made it faulty, and provided information to support that. Namely, that per the premise of his analogy, pursuing Kompany is more akin to Bayern going after the manager of Dormstadt (newly promoted team which finished bottom of the table in the Bundesliga) than going after the manager of Heidenheim (which finished eighth in their first ever season in the German top flight).
You then replied to my post, seemingly arguing against something some other person(s) had said, rather than what I had said in my post, given I had already made many of the same arguments you were making in your reply to my post.
It is getting very complicated!