Somebody at The Sun, is having a laugh!
MCFC Info @MCFClnfo 7m7 minutes ago
Southampton have slapped a £70m price tag on rumoured City target Virgil van Dijk (25). [The Sun]
If you wiped your arse on the sun,more shit would come off the paper.
Somebody at The Sun, is having a laugh!
MCFC Info @MCFClnfo 7m7 minutes ago
Southampton have slapped a £70m price tag on rumoured City target Virgil van Dijk (25). [The Sun]
That number included his supposed offered wage as well.Headline from metro:
Manchester City to stun Chelsea and Liverpool with £100million Virgil van Dijk transfer package
lol
Headline from metro:
Manchester City to stun Chelsea and Liverpool with £100million Virgil van Dijk transfer package
lol
I don't get the thinking of a large number of posters on here who seem obsessed with the idea of a first choice 11. There wasn't one last season when the squad was filled with shite. Nobody could ever correctly guess the line up from one week to the next.So where does VVD fit into the puzzle if Vinny stays fit? Or, to phrase it another way, would we really invest over £50m on a CB who wouldn't be first choice in the position unless injuries happen? (and would he even want to come under those terms?)
I'm all for our interest here, but if Pep is that high on Kompany then maybe this isn't the right target. Vinny's fitness is a gamble in either direction.
The fees being bandied about are insane but at least we would get a defender who we know can cut it in the Premiership. If we can recoup something for Mangala and Otemendi then it won't be so painful.
I could be wrong as I don't usually read news stories on other clubs, but how many other transfer stories does the players wages get included in the overall fee or "package"Transfer "package" of £100mil...c£50mil transfer fee and £180,000pw on 5 year contract
I could be wrong as I don't usually read news stories on other clubs, but how many other transfer stories does the players wages get included in the overall fee or "package"