DenisLawBackHeel74
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 12,755
If these rumours are to be believed and city and pool are in for him, you’d have to question the lads judgement and ambition if he didn’t choose city....imo of course
That would be the opinion of every non Liverpool supporter too.If these rumours are to be believed and city and pool are in for him, you’d have to question the lads judgement and ambition if he didn’t choose city....imo of course
but it is only £20 million plus MangalaTo be fair pal prices are inflated anyway and think we get fucked over because of who we are now, yes £20 million was tongue in cheek but honestly don't see £60 for that amount of dough there has to be someone better for that amount I may be wrong though
That would be the opinion of every non Liverpool supporter too.
If these rumours are to be believed and city and pool are in for him, you’d have to question the lads judgement and ambition if he didn’t choose city....imo of course
There were more than enough reports about a final £120m bid with £20 in add ons made by Barca. WC year or not, I fail to see what that has to do with Liverpool refusing to sell Coutinho.£140m?? I highly doubt they bid that much. I remember reading the actual bid was around 100m.
Had it not been a World Cup year they would of sold. Coutinho is having a good season and needs to continue doing well or could easily lose his WC place.
So Coutinho plays well this season and does well in the WC with Brazil and his value goes up even more. Brazil have a great chance of being champions. Only logical thing to do was refuse all bids for him. I said this in the summer. This was the only option from a business point of view.
Refusing to improve a weak defense and keeper also shows little ambition. Don’t believe the propaganda, they could challenge if they keep their best players, buy VVD and another CB, buy some fullbacks, a DM and keeper. Can’t see that happening so can’t see them challenging.
You could equally argue that going to Liverpool and trying to win the title with them is more ambitious than joining than the champions elect. It’s certainly a bigger challenge.
^^This^^You could equally argue that going to Liverpool and trying to win the title with them is more ambitious than joining than the champions elect. It’s certainly a bigger challenge.
No it isn't. You only have to look at City circa 2010 - 2012 for your answer to that one.Nah, that’s some fuzzy logic you’ve got there Ric.
Surely the best players only want to play for the best teams where they have a chance of winning trophies.
If he signs do we go back to a back 3
You could equally argue that going to Liverpool and trying to win the title with them is more ambitious than joining than the champions elect. It’s certainly a bigger challenge.
Spot on.Yeah, I'm not a fan of all the "Who on Earth would go to Liverpool" comments - feels very reminiscent of what other teams' fans used to say about us.
Liverpool have a defence which is massively let down by the individual errors of 3 players - the 2 CB's and the GK. If they got players of VVD's calibre in each of those positions, they'd be at least our closest contenders, and could even shape up to push us. Naby Keita will be another phenomenal player joining them in the summer.
So I can easily see Klopp selling it to Van Dijk to be the guy who comes in and starts fixing their defence.
He could definitely still prefer to come here, and I expect most players would take us, the sure bet, over Liverpool - but it's not an outrageous suggestion that he might choose them.
Refusing to improve a weak defense and keeper also shows little ambition.
Fully disagree there mate. A player will join the club where he feels he can win the most trophies, unless he moves for money. We can offer him more money and a way better chance at trophies. As I said earlier the only reason he’d join the dippers is if he’s a lifelong Liverpool fan just like Chamberlain when he turned down more money from arsenal and Chelsea.You could equally argue that going to Liverpool and trying to win the title with them is more ambitious than joining than the champions elect. It’s certainly a bigger challenge.
^^This^^
I really fear some of us are beginning to sound like ManUre, Arsenal, Chelsea & Liverpool fans when we first posed a threat to their PL dominance.
I pray we never end up thinking we're the be all & end all of football & have a god given right for the best players & success.
I fully disagree with you based on the fact your argument is exactly the same one used against us 7 years ago by those above us at the time.Fully disagree there mate. A player will join the club where he feels he can win the most trophies, unless he moves for money. We can offer him more money and a way better chance at trophies. As I said earlier the only reason he’d join the dippers is if he’s a lifelong Liverpool fan just like Chamberlain when he turned down more money from arsenal and Chelsea.
Fully disagree there mate. A player will join the club where he feels he can win the most trophies, unless he moves for money. We can offer him more money and a way better chance at trophies. As I said earlier the only reason he’d join the dippers is if he’s a lifelong Liverpool fan just like Chamberlain when he turned down more money from arsenal and Chelsea.
ManUre fans said the same about Nasri in 2011, but turn them down he did.I think you missed my second post where I acknowledged that it’s difficult to say these things without sounding arrogant because I think it genuinely is. I’ve got nothing against other teams in top 6 but surely at this moment in time if city give you a call you would be certifiable to turn them down.
No it isn't. You only have to look at City circa 2010 - 2012 for your answer to that one.