Watford (H) Post Match Thread

Was thinking the very same thing....Ive never heard of PGMOL or any refereeing institution either being consulted or offering a judgement in the middle of the game.

For me Sterling CANT be offside....the defender has touched the ball last and you cannot be offside from when the last touch comes off the opposition...thoug they are saying the ruling says that if a player is making an attempt to play the ball even if the opposition player plays the ball onto you and you have started in an offside position then you are still offside.
It's more subtle than that though. If the defender deliberately plays the ball back and you nip in and get it, then you can't be offside. But if both players go for a ball played by an attacker, the defender gets to it first but it falls to the attacker and he scores, then that's offside, because the attacker was still going for the original ball forward from the attacker.
 
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
• interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or

• interfering with an opponent by:
• preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
• challenging an opponent for the ball or
• clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
• making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball or

• gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
• rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent
• been deliberately saved by any opponent
**
The decision comes down to whether one of the middle block occurs.
 
Haha im not bothered either. We deserved the win. We can disagree and and that’s fine. The offside law is a farce.

The law is a farce mate and so open to interpretation its untrue.

The ref gives the goal but Walton, someone who has history of fucking us over couldn't wait to say no goal and this is the issue.

The law should make it impossible for anyone to disagree.
 
Fuckinghell, do bt go into this much depth regarding controversial (talking points) decisions for the dippers?

Erm...... no.
Fuck bt.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.