So, no release clause?
So, no release clause?
This is not correct (he does not have the right info or contacts at City)
There is a release clause and was requested of all clubs.
It is 200m euros and set so high for a reason, as nobody will likely get close to it.
The two year exit clause is not correct. I am told it can only be triggered if two years out of Champions League, which was to protect both us and him.
Please don't listen to this guy, he is a massive chancer and have even seen him lift stuff from this site.
Wouldn’t say €200mil is that much for Haaland?This is not correct (he does not have the right info or contacts at City)
There is a release clause and was requested of all clubs.
It is 200m euros and set so high for a reason, as nobody will likely get close to it.
The two year exit clause is not correct. I am told it can only be triggered if two years out of Champions League, which was to protect both us and him.
Please don't listen to this guy, he is a massive chancer and have even seen him lift stuff from this site.
Haha why do these Spanish clubs, (after missing out on him this time round when they wanted him) seem to think city are some sort of stepping stone? When has that ever been the case? 9 times out of 10 we are someone’s final destination. Similar to when we got Pep and got told “he only does 2 or 3 years” how did that turn out? Madrid have just openly come out and disrespected Haaland with the bench comments. I don’t see how he will be gagging to play for them.There are better ways to force the club to renegotiate the contract every year without putting a buy out clause.
In Barcelona we know this very well unfortunately
The only thing I hope is that he doesn't go to Madrid and City may have made a mistake with that buy out clause.
There were many doubts about Haaland's physical condition these last 2 years, last season Erling missed 16 games.
That is why Erling demanded his club not to publish any more updates on his injuries, so that it would not be an obstacle in his future contract.
City may be taking all the risk of the deal so that in 2 years Madrid can take him more mature and ready for an elite team.
And if he eventually has serious physical problems Haaland will hold on to his contract.
To be fair, what has he said in this case that has been incorrect? He just said the reports about a release clause from the media are wrong, which if what you said is true he would be right.This is not correct (he does not have the right info or contacts at City)
There is a release clause and was requested of all clubs.
It is 200m euros and set so high for a reason, as nobody will likely get close to it.
The two year exit clause is not correct. I am told it can only be triggered if two years out of Champions League, which was to protect both us and him.
Please don't listen to this guy, he is a massive chancer and have even seen him lift stuff from this site.
Wouldn’t say €200mil is that much for Haaland?