That may explain why we've been terrible for the majority of the season. A player who's flattered to deceive throughout the year being one of our better players is no ringing endorsement.Marvin said:? Surely one of our better playerssuper_city_si said:For the love of God...no Navas. Pls.
cibaman said:I think Navas is ok. But his main attribute surely is as an impact sub against tiring defences. I dont really understand why he gets a starting role so often.
I'd prefer it if he was selected because he can pick a man out when crossing, finish one on ones (well finish in any situation) or could deliver a corner that doesn't look like its purposely trying to clear the 18 yard box. Giving a fuck should be the minimum requirement.mosssideblue said:cibaman said:I think Navas is ok. But his main attribute surely is as an impact sub against tiring defences. I dont really understand why he gets a starting role so often.
Perhaps he's selected because he gives a fook
mosssideblue said:cibaman said:I think Navas is ok. But his main attribute surely is as an impact sub against tiring defences. I dont really understand why he gets a starting role so often.
Perhaps he's selected because he gives a fook