Westminster voting intentions weekly round up

[urban genie]

Translates in a GE

LP 268 seats
CP 122 seats
BP 112 seats
LD 72 seats
SNP 53 seats
GP 1 seat



Latest polls

Second one would translate at a GE

BP 303 seat
LP 205 seats
CP 26 seats
LD 33 seats
GR 1 seat
GUK & UKIP no seats

Updated with translation of first poll into seats at a GE


LP 268 seats
CP 122 seats
BP 112 seats
LD 72 seats
SNP 53 seats
GP 1 seat


A fairly new pollster this one

 

[mcfc1632]

The intelligence of the UK voter ! The party with no policies leads the way.

It's like a Monty Python sketch.

It nix very clear on one policy and that obviously resonates with the voting public

Hopefully the time will not come when it needs to establish a full manifesto

 

[Ancient Citizen]

The intelligence of the UK voter ! The party with no policies leads the way.

It's like a Monty Python sketch.

It never takes long, yet again when the electorate don't vote the way they should, it's a lack of intelligence.
That this can be claimed after this particular election, proves that those on the losing side, again, are the
ones deficient in grey matter.

 

[urban genie]

It never takes long, yet again when the electorate don't vote the way they should, it's a lack of intelligence.
That this can be claimed after this particular election, proves that those on the losing side, again, are the
ones deficient in grey matter.

Works both ways if remainers were polling better or corbyn it would be classed as people being fooled with project fear or corbyns promising fantasy land rewards and idiots are laping it up.

The fact is the general public are not given facts, misinformed and uneducated on a lot of things political and go for the best sounding deal or reject that most criticised.

The present leaders in the polls are saying what the public wants to hear not always whats best for them.

Tories and labour have done the same in the past too.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

The present leaders in the polls are saying what the public wants to hear not always whats best for them

Oh, so because the public is voting, in their millions, for something considered by you to be not in their interests,
they're unaware of the facts, misinformed and uneducated.
The public has been subjected to this condescending, patronising claptrap for the last three years, and is responding.

 

[urban genie]

Oh, so because the public is voting, in their millions, for something considered by you to be not in their interests,
they're unaware of the facts, misinformed and uneducated.
The public has been subjected to this condescending, patronising claptrap for the last three years, and is responding.

Neber said that, don't be so reactionary.

Said your point was flawed because all side claim the public is foolish if they lose.

Were people given the full facts over the iraq war? No
Were they given the full facts on what leaving would mean? No

That is why I said misinformed and uneducated about the issues not in general and that was clear, nothing condecending about that, if anyone is being condecending and treating the public with no respect it's farage, johnson, may, corbyn, campbell etc with thier lies and fudging the truth.

 

[dave_blue12]

It never takes long, yet again when the electorate don't vote the way they should, it's a lack of intelligence.
That this can be claimed after this particular election, proves that those on the losing side, again, are the
ones deficient in grey matter.

Please explain how it's smart to vote for a party with no policies.

It's idiocy plain and simple. That you think it isn't reinforces that view.

 

[Summerbuzz]

It might be a bit of wishful thinking but I think it is impossible to use an ordinary national vote to seats won model with those sort of national numbers.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Please explain how it's smart to vote for a party with no policies.

It's idiocy plain and simple. That you think it isn't reinforces that view.

No, I won't explain, as most intelligent, rational people have worked it out.
It's now more than apparent that people without these qualities haven't.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Neber said that, don't be so reactionary.

Said your point was flawed because all side claim the public is foolish if they lose.

Were people given the full facts over the iraq war? No
Were they given the full facts on what leaving would mean? No

That is why I said misinformed and uneducated about the issues not in general and that was clear, nothing condecending about that, if anyone is being condecending and treating the public with no respect it's farage, johnson, may, corbyn, campbell etc with thier lies and fudging the truth.

This is simply a repetition of your previous post, but embellished and filled with self justification.
It's simply presenting the results of elections as if all of them are flawed because you've decided, various
topics were not fully understood.
Sooner or later, the losers of these elections are going to have to come to terms with the fact that their stance
is not what the public wants, and that the foot stamping outrage they've being displaying merely stretches the lead
for their opponents in the next vote.