yeseye
Well-Known Member
All-round no?
There’s always one.
I think Lampard, overall, was more effective, and thus better.‘All around’ was the key for my decision, there’s not many parts of Gerrards game that he couldn’t do, tackling, positioning, reading the game, influence, passing ability, crossing, heading, scoring - he had it all. Just a shame he was a dipper.
If we're being literal about the all round player it has to be Shaw.All-round no?
I think Lampard, overall, was more effective, and thus better.
But I think—when it comes to comprehensive skills and natural ability allowing them to be the most adaptable player England has produced—Stones has the potential to stand alone when all is said and done.
He has played CB, RB, DM, CM, AM, RW (sometimes at various times in a single match), all to a high level.
I genuinely think he could do a job as a target man in a pinch.
He is a prototypal Pep player, if one exists.
Poobag actually looks ok with a sensible trim.
Bastard…If we're being literal about the all round player it has to be Shaw.
I’m excited for Stones and watching his transaction under Pep, been phenomenal these last few years.
That's a bit fattist....If we're being literal about the all round player it has to be Shaw.
But he’s not though is he?
Mourinho called him a porker to embarrass him. The lad has no timber on him, I think you are getting duped by that prick Mourinho.
That's a bit fattist....
He was a belting player mate, and is absolutely up there !Bryan Robson, despite being a rag git who got away with some dirty play because he was England captain, did have a good mix of skills and could score, pass and tackle.
Off to wash my mouth out.
I always that Jack Charlton had a number of limitations in his game...... ;-)Dare I say it that **** Charlton was a great player as well.
No denying it sadly.
Booby Moore up there with Beckenbauer in my opinion so I would say Bobby Moore the best English player in my time.