yeseye
Well-Known Member
All-round no?
There’s always one.
I think Lampard, overall, was more effective, and thus better.‘All around’ was the key for my decision, there’s not many parts of Gerrards game that he couldn’t do, tackling, positioning, reading the game, influence, passing ability, crossing, heading, scoring - he had it all. Just a shame he was a dipper.
If we're being literal about the all round player it has to be Shaw.All-round no?
I think Lampard, overall, was more effective, and thus better.
But I think—when it comes to comprehensive skills and natural ability allowing them to be the most adaptable player England has produced—Stones has the potential to stand alone when all is said and done.
He has played CB, RB, DM, CM, AM, RW (sometimes at various times in a single match), all to a high level.
I genuinely think he could do a job as a target man in a pinch.
He is a prototypal Pep player, if one exists.
Poobag actually looks ok with a sensible trim.