Who is Your Favourite Ancient Roman?

Rascal said:
Herod was a bit of ****, I know not Roman, but he sucked roman cock so they let him be a bit of a ****

Only if you believe Luke's gospel - which is chronologically hopelessly incoherent and basically impossible.
 
Hadrian, master builder and the only person I know on this earth to realise what a bunch of tw@ts the scots were. Once this referendum is over plea to English rebuild the wall. :-)
 
Henkeman said:
Rascal said:
Herod was a bit of ****, I know not Roman, but he sucked roman cock so they let him be a bit of a ****

Only if you believe Luke's gospel - which is chronologically hopelessly incoherent and basically impossible.

Luke 23.6

That Herod was a bit of a ****

Check it mate, its there in plain aramaic
 
Rascal said:
Henkeman said:
Rascal said:
Herod was a bit of ****, I know not Roman, but he sucked roman cock so they let him be a bit of a ****

Only if you believe Luke's gospel - which is chronologically hopelessly incoherent and basically impossible.

Luke 23.6

That Herod was a bit of a ****

Check it mate, its there in plain aramaic

<anorak>There's your problem you see, you've bought a fake. It was written in Greek :-P </anorak>
 
Henkeman said:
Rascal said:
Henkeman said:
Only if you believe Luke's gospel - which is chronologically hopelessly incoherent and basically impossible.

Luke 23.6

That Herod was a bit of a ****

Check it mate, its there in plain aramaic

<anorak>There's your problem you see, you've bought a fake. It was written in Greek :-P </anorak>

Fuck, my ancient greek has lapsed as no one on our street speaks it much anymore, so I got an aramaic copy of a guy on Stocky market. Swore blind itvwas genuine. Even signed lots of love Luke xxx
 
GrumpyFrog said:
You're all messing about: it has to be the man they called Optimus Princeps, the one and only Trajan.

Perhaps the greatest of the imperial commanders, instigator of many domestic improvements, and ruled with great popularity over a peaceful (excluding the Dacians etc) and prosperous empire. His feats as a part-time stone mason also continue to impress to this day.

rome-trajans-column-640x480.jpg
This and only this, Trajans campaign against the Dacians is often regarded as the best thought out and best executed campaign of any Roman army anywhere
 
blue underpants said:
GrumpyFrog said:
You're all messing about: it has to be the man they called Optimus Princeps, the one and only Trajan.

Perhaps the greatest of the imperial commanders, instigator of many domestic improvements, and ruled with great popularity over a peaceful (excluding the Dacians etc) and prosperous empire. His feats as a part-time stone mason also continue to impress to this day.

rome-trajans-column-640x480.jpg
This and only this, Trajans campaign against the Dacians is often regarded as the best thought out and best executed campaign of any Roman army anywhere

It was one of the first recorded cases of genocide!
 
Ducado said:
blue underpants said:
GrumpyFrog said:
You're all messing about: it has to be the man they called Optimus Princeps, the one and only Trajan.

Perhaps the greatest of the imperial commanders, instigator of many domestic improvements, and ruled with great popularity over a peaceful (excluding the Dacians etc) and prosperous empire. His feats as a part-time stone mason also continue to impress to this day.

rome-trajans-column-640x480.jpg
This and only this, Trajans campaign against the Dacians is often regarded as the best thought out and best executed campaign of any Roman army anywhere

It was one of the first recorded cases of genocide!

And people get upset with the yanks.
 
To be honest, I don't really have time for the Romans they were quite apt at committing genocide and rewriting history to suit themselves (sound familiar?)

Take this country for example, one would think that before they took over, it was an island full of savage barbarians waiting to be civilised when there is mounting evidence that it was a thriving cultured and peaceful island, the German Tribes and the Persians had the right idea about them
 
Ducado said:
To be honest, I don't really have time for the Romans they were quite apt at committing genocide and rewriting history to suit themselves (sound familiar?)

Take this country for example, one would think that before they took over, it was an island full of savage barbarians waiting to be civilised when there is mounting evidence that it was a thriving cultured and peaceful island, the German Tribes and the Persians had the right idea about them

Er. It wasn't peaceful. Caratacus' tribe the Catuvellauni had their capital at Colchester because they'd invaded the Trinovantes territory, slaughtered them and taken over. The tribes were constantly at war with each other, and it could be argued that was the principal reason for the success of the Roman invasion - some of them openly backed Rome to do down their neighbours.

As for Rome itself, if it hadn't been Rome it would have been someone else. It was the nature of the times, and Rome was relatively enlightened for the time. If it had gone differently we would have been talking about the Carthaginians in the same way. Love and peace as a motto wouldn't have got you very far back then. It doesn't work that well now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.