Who started the ridiculous notion that City were better without Haaland ?

[Man_City_Loyal]

scousers and rags

 

[yankblue]

Morons

 

[MCFC Wirral]

There’s nothing wrong with thinking differently and there’s nothing wrong with having a genuine opinion.

Was the poster wrong? Yes.

 

[kippax_blueboy]

Overall we have scored 84 goals in the league this season. We have 6 games left but will we score 100 goals. Our record is 106 goals where 4 players reached double figures. It appears to me that with Haaland we are not scoring more goals and maybe less than average depending on what we do in the last six matches.

 

[Blueknows]

Does anyone remember who started this nonsense a few week/months ago, declaring that we were a better team without him ?
Did it originate from some clown in the media, some nobless cretin from tv, or an even bigger idiot from Twitter ?
Whoever it was, started quite a debate (and a fucking bad one at that).
50 goals says differently you gormless twat, whoever you are.

Initially it was Nunez is the better buy then he chose the wrong club , overated, will struggle in the premiership , won't score more than 15 , makes city worse , when he started banging them.in for fun the media moved onto how many touches he had , even laughing and joking in games about it with many graphs and touches per.minute to goal ratios , when erling was breaking records, which seems like every time he plays they have nothing left to say , its jealousy pure and simple , it's why most.of.our players never get the plaudits , if any of.our.players played for the rags or.dippers there would be.documentaries made about them

 

[Bluearmy]

The Cartel clubs media lapdogs

 

[mad4city]

In reality it was that stupid World Cup disrupted the middle of our season.

Oddly enough, having the World Cup in December might have helped us to win the League last year.
Even though we had barely any centre halves left and the title was in the balance, I'm not sure Pep could have expected Laporte to play in May with an injury, like he did, if the World Cup was due to start in June.

 

[jollylescott]

I don’t really like to point the finger, but after a forensic investigation it appears this controversy was initiated by @Mad Eyed Screamer.

Must have been under riding instructions from Ric. That’s the only excuse I can think of :)

 

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

I don’t really like to point the finger, but after a forensic investigation it appears this controversy was initiated by @Mad Eyed Screamer.

Must have been under riding instructions from Ric. That’s the only excuse I can think of :)

Firstly....... snitches get stitches.......

Secondly, if you look back I asked the question as to whether or not City were better without Haaland, rather than stating that City were better without him.....

 

[jollylescott]

Firstly....... snitches get stitches.......

Secondly, if you look back I asked the question as to whether or not City were better without Haaland, rather than stating that City were better without him.....

We need you on Lord Pannick’s legal team. Being in the legal field myself the fine art of hairsplitting is an essential skill :)

Anyway I’m off to the doc to get my stitches removed!