Who started the ridiculous notion that City were better without Haaland ?

I don’t really like to point the finger, but after a forensic investigation it appears this controversy was initiated by @Mad Eyed Screamer.

Must have been under riding instructions from Ric. That’s the only excuse I can think of :)
Not surprised it was that tone-deaf ****
 
Does anyone remember who started this nonsense a few week/months ago, declaring that we were a better team without him ?
Did it originate from some clown in the media, some nobless cretin from tv, or an even bigger idiot from Twitter ?
Whoever it was, started quite a debate (and a fucking bad one at that).
50 goals says differently you gormless twat, whoever you are.
The same clown who said we play better without Kev perhaps?
 
At one stage I suppose it was literally true because he was employed solely for his striking ability with even our goalkeepers expected to be ball players he was excused team duties and told to just score goals.

Recent games have demonstrated his team qualities, who'd have thought it Haaland setting up KDB to score.
 
Aguero became our record scorer but at one point Pep was starting Jesus ahead of him. It’s never wrong to express an opinion unless it’s to deliberately offend.
 
did the silly rumour start on sky or talkshite, then the fans that arent capable of making their own decisions follow suit ? Then of course the idiot so called neutral fans took over and really gave it some, the wannabe manager fans !

said it was utter shit at the time, any manager in any league would take haaland, how could people dismiss a goal machine.. The problem with the team at various points early this season was that they where not linking up or pressing, passing was sloppy
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.