EalingBlue2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 5,571
The past is the most relevant thing to compare to, it shows where we have come from, whether we are progressing and getting better. it is entirely rational and logical to talk about it.
The problem is with the anti hughes brigade is the desparate desire to criticise everything, this undermines the case, concentrate on specific tactical issues and discuss.
IE did he pick the right team?
Did his half time team talk make things better or worse?
Did individual mistakes or tactics result in the defensive lapses?
Did his subs work?
etc etc
trying to find anything to moan about looks like you are sitting there at home desparately to try and find a new topic to slag Hughes off for, broadly on the above he got it right at the weekend so you then try and think of something else no matter how unrelated to the game it is>
The problem is with the anti hughes brigade is the desparate desire to criticise everything, this undermines the case, concentrate on specific tactical issues and discuss.
IE did he pick the right team?
Did his half time team talk make things better or worse?
Did individual mistakes or tactics result in the defensive lapses?
Did his subs work?
etc etc
trying to find anything to moan about looks like you are sitting there at home desparately to try and find a new topic to slag Hughes off for, broadly on the above he got it right at the weekend so you then try and think of something else no matter how unrelated to the game it is>