Why rearrange the united league fixture ?

So the conversation today went:

Sad Deluded Sky Sport rag: Doesn't matter we've got a £300 million deal wiv shevroley
Me: Yes, but, it's performance based.
sdssr: £300 million, we don't need to get top four
Me: Yes you do, it's performance based.
sdssr: £300 million, cos we're nytid
Me: But, they won't pay it if you don't keep winning things
sdssr: £300 million
Me: Fuck Off, I am off to the beer festival at the velodrome tomorrow then Wembley in March
s
 
geoff hammond said:
I don't see the need to rearrange this match at the swamp.

We could send a squad to play the Black Cats at Wembley and still have enough decent players left over to take three points at United on the same day.
Funny as your post maybe, I doubt we'd win both games, and we could end up losing both games.
 
cleavers said:
geoff hammond said:
I don't see the need to rearrange this match at the swamp.

We could send a squad to play the Black Cats at Wembley and still have enough decent players left over to take three points at United on the same day.
Funny as your post maybe, I doubt we'd win both games, and we could end up losing both games.

Of course we could...we're City:) just sit back and enjoy the light hearted banter.
 
bluemc1 said:
mayo31 said:
Dont give anyone ideas

In the 85/86 we played Utd on the Saturday and Chelsea on the Sunday in the Full Members Cup

Went to both - drew 2-2 at the swamp and lost 5-4, bizarre game that final. 5-1 down with 5 mins at the most left.

i left at 5-1, i was 7 bless

yooonited refused to move the derby fixture , i was at the game , if the game had lasted 5 more minutes we would have won 6-5 , and added the full members cup to our trophy haul .
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.