Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Caveman said:
DD said:
Huge game for Mancini tomorrow. I got the distinct feeling in Dortmund that a significant proportion of our fans are finally starting to see through him. His tactics degenerated into an abomination once again and there is only so long that we are going to continue to grind out results in the Premier League in spite of him.

If we win and go back to the top, he'll be flavour of the month again, but if we lose and go six points behind, then I think he is on borrowed time. It might sound harsh when we are unbeaten but our embarrassing Champions League form, the Balotelli obsession and the fact that he is simply not getting anything like 100% from a squad that is good enough to win the league comfortably, is all adding up to create a big problem in the making.

I reckon somebody like Jürgen Klopp would get an extra 20% out of the players and we'd be damned near untouchable.

It's a pivotal game and, for the greater good, defeat might not be such a bad thing, in my opinion. It won't stop me backing them to the hilt tomorrow, for all we all want is success, but success would be achieved more easily with the right man in charge.

I have seen much evidence to suggest that the players are not entirely happy with his methods. Can all 20 odd of them be wrong and him be right? We'd have walked the league last year and this year with an infinitely better squad of players than the opposition but we didn't and we won't. For me, that is down to a manager who doesn't improve the players, he merely maintains them, if he doesn't downgrade them.
What a load of shite!

Although i would never wish a defeat on us,let alone to that lot.....(get a grip DD!) I can understand the message behind the post - the acceleration of a needed managerial change.
 
BillyShears said:
The Future's Blue said:
BillyShears said:
The fact you and Mancio have picked up on this one nuance in a post of that length, to try and question the integrity of the poster, says more about you two and your irrational defensiveness of Mancini.
No it doesn't, what it says is that the integrity of a poster is questioned when they don't have all the facts. I noticed your good self defended the post to be an accurate statement, yet it wasn't.

What it also fails to say is that Inter topped their group on 2 occassions and on another he Inter came second behind Bayern. The first season seen them win 4 and draw 2 in the groups before beating Porto, the current CL holders in the last 16. In the quarters, they would have actually been beaten by AC at the time the game was called off but it is something you would remember well as an Inter fan, surely. The AC team were also one that had just beaten United to get into the Milan Derby, before they went onto the final and were beaten in sensational style by Liverpool.

Would you like me to go on?

You can go on all day if you like mate. Nothing changes the facts. The facts weren't incorrect in his post. You can spin them all day and all you do is continue to show an unnerving amount of defensiveness about Mancini.
But I'm not, am I Billy? There is no spin whatsoever, which way have I spun it?

There are many on here who question a post just on opinion, the author of that post didn't even have the full 'ish and what was supposed to be an authoritive post.

What gets me is how many have painted Mancini's Champions League exploits. Yes, he hasn't got past the quarters but how many do. We all know it's a bit of a luck dip when you get out of the groups and it's anything but certain to get into the semi final. With Inter, Mancini managed to win the group stage 3 out of 4 times, of which he twice got to the quarters and twice fell at the last 16. On 2 occasions he went out on the away goal rule and nn 2 occassions he also had to qualify from the 3rd qualifying round to get there.

Yes, he got sacked for not getting them further but at the same time it wasn't a bad run that he had, not one that I as a City fan would call 'Shit'. Especially when you consider that he had won the league on every occasion he competed in the CL.

As you will see, most of that is factually based, not opinion or conjecture, which is what I've tried to put across all along. Regardless of my view of Mancini (which you haven't got a clue about, to be fair), I'll call a turd 'A Turd', and that post you mentioned, turned into 'A Turd'.
 
DD said:
Huge game for Mancini tomorrow. I got the distinct feeling in Dortmund that a significant proportion of our fans are finally starting to see through him. His tactics degenerated into an abomination once again and there is only so long that we are going to continue to grind out results in the Premier League in spite of him.

If we win and go back to the top, he'll be flavour of the month again, but if we lose and go six points behind, then I think he is on borrowed time. It might sound harsh when we are unbeaten but our embarrassing Champions League form, the Balotelli obsession and the fact that he is simply not getting anything like 100% from a squad that is good enough to win the league comfortably, is all adding up to create a big problem in the making.

I reckon somebody like Jürgen Klopp would get an extra 20% out of the players and we'd be damned near untouchable.

It's a pivotal game and, for the greater good, defeat might not be such a bad thing, in my opinion. It won't stop me backing them to the hilt tomorrow, for all we all want is success, but success would be achieved more easily with the right man in charge.

I have seen much evidence to suggest that the players are not entirely happy with his methods. Can all 20 odd of them be wrong and him be right? We'd have walked the league last year and this year with an infinitely better squad of players than the opposition but we didn't and we won't. For me, that is down to a manager who doesn't improve the players, he merely maintains them, if he doesn't downgrade them.
You only seem to post when Mancini appears to be in trouble. You seem to crave vindication on this matter to an unhealthy extent. If we lose tomorrow I am sure you will be on here as quick as a flash, pontificating that you were right all along.

You seem to hate Mancini more than you love City, for reasons at which I can only guess.
 
FantasyIreland said:
Caveman said:
DD said:
Huge game for Mancini tomorrow. I got the distinct feeling in Dortmund that a significant proportion of our fans are finally starting to see through him. His tactics degenerated into an abomination once again and there is only so long that we are going to continue to grind out results in the Premier League in spite of him.

If we win and go back to the top, he'll be flavour of the month again, but if we lose and go six points behind, then I think he is on borrowed time. It might sound harsh when we are unbeaten but our embarrassing Champions League form, the Balotelli obsession and the fact that he is simply not getting anything like 100% from a squad that is good enough to win the league comfortably, is all adding up to create a big problem in the making.

I reckon somebody like Jürgen Klopp would get an extra 20% out of the players and we'd be damned near untouchable.

It's a pivotal game and, for the greater good, defeat might not be such a bad thing, in my opinion. It won't stop me backing them to the hilt tomorrow, for all we all want is success, but success would be achieved more easily with the right man in charge.

I have seen much evidence to suggest that the players are not entirely happy with his methods. Can all 20 odd of them be wrong and him be right? We'd have walked the league last year and this year with an infinitely better squad of players than the opposition but we didn't and we won't. For me, that is down to a manager who doesn't improve the players, he merely maintains them, if he doesn't downgrade them.
What a load of shite!

Although i would never wish a defeat on us,let alone to that lot.....(get a grip DD!) I can understand the message behind the post - the acceleration of a needed managerial change.
Does anyone think we need a manager change right now, this is what he's suggesting. I'm all for debate but if we win this game we are top of the league and unbeaten, if we lose then we need a new manager? DD needs to get a grip
 
The Future's Blue said:
Regardless of my view of Mancini (which you haven't got a clue about, to be fair), I'll call a turd 'A Turd', and that post you mentioned, turned into 'A Turd'.

Your hanging that whole argument on the basis that he said Inter lost 3 - 0 to AC, which they did. Your making my point for me but hey ho, you clearly don't see it.
 
BillyShears said:
The Future's Blue said:
Regardless of my view of Mancini (which you haven't got a clue about, to be fair), I'll call a turd 'A Turd', and that post you mentioned, turned into 'A Turd'.

Your hanging that whole argument on the basis that he said Inter lost 3 - 0 to AC, which they did. Your making my point for me but hey ho, you clearly don't see it.
You blokes still on about the 3-0 lol...that was yesterday!
 
What was it that Bacon said when he was told there had been 14 MCFC managers since he took over at the rags?

"Well, I wish it was 15".

Perhaps he's posting on here in his spare time.
 
Berkovic_blue said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
bellbuzzer said:
this thread needs an 'expert' to point out the differences in CL football, and the domestic version, and why RM cannot cope. "No good in Europe" is too loose, needs flesh on the bones for us novices

Do the stats not sum it up for you?

Do they tell you WHY?

Shall I give it a go?

Dortmund away:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009582/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009582/pitch-view/influence" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... /influence</a>

What we see at the top is Dortmund clearly having the attacking momentum and what you notice on the diagram is that they have a much higher concentration of what UEFA call "Effective play" in around our box, and importantly it is spread down both flanks as well, showing that they get width in their play. City have no effective plays down the right side despite deploying Maicon, and on the left it is a rare play by Nasri. There are a few plays from the centre of the pitch just inside Dortmund's half but there are hardly any plays around the edge of the box unlike Dortmund who swarm that area. If you also notice who causes those events(hover over the splodge) you will see that they are mainly strikers, and in this case this shows the deepness of our play for them to be that deep. On the Dortmund side you see the fullbacks, attacking midfielders and wingers all contributing to the play just outside the box, all interlinking across that area with the appearances by Reus and Lewandowski predominantly occurring on the 18 yard line. Countless apperances by the Dortmund midfielders, hardly any from Nasri, Garcia, Barry, Sinclair(none), if we look at the average positions of both teams:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009582/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009582/pitch-view/team-shape" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... team-shape</a>

You see that we both have a similar set-up at the back. However the midfield is the contrast, with City you can join up the midfielders into a relatively small shape, Dortmund you can see have an almost V shape, giving them much more width and a lot more space to play in. The dotted lines show the link-up between the players and you can see that the Dortmund players can interlink through this V allowing quicker movement of the ball over a wider area, City's play is very narrow and is relying on going through the heart of the defence. This joins up well with the first map as it shows how Dortmund became a lot more effective across the pitch in our final third whereas we, apart from very rare occassions from Nasri offered nothing in wider areas and had to rely on the strikers forcing their way through the central final 3rd of Dortmund.

Now that only explains our problems in Dortmund, every game is different as we can see from the Madrid home game:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009559/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009559/pitch-view/influence" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... /influence</a>

What we can see here is that in this game we put on a much better showing going forward, our strikers are higher up the pitch and there is more play on our side of the halfway line showing more good build-up. What we can notice is that our attacking play is across the edge of the area. Maicon makes a much larger impact on this game and we limit Madrid in wide areas meaning that they also have to rely on the centre of the pitch, however they do have some good plays as well showing the competitive nature of the game. Madrid do have more effective areas around the edge of the 6 yard box however suggesting they are finding their way into close range easier and more effective plays from the deep lying areas of midfield which you'd expect with a player like Xabi Alonso in their side.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009559/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009559/pitch-view/team-shape" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... team-shape</a>

This map does look a bit odd but there are things that we can see, most notable of which is the interlinking between the back 4 and Yaya, the wingbacks being much higher up the pitch into the Madrid half and the triangle between Nasri, Silva and Yaya. So we have more width(albeit AK got taken off at HT), we end up with a tight defensive midfield spot as Garcia and Yaya are on top of each other but there is more room further forward as Silva and Nasri play further away from each other than what happened in Dortmund. On the Madrid map you can see they are fairly narrow and that Di Maria plays very deep, and that having the extra body in the centre of the park in Garcia in the 2nd half may well have been a reason why the 2nd half was more even. You can see the link that can easily form from Xabi Alonso, into Khedira through Modric to Ronaldo where the danger will start, that's reflected in the fact that the areas on the first map around our area that are green are predominantly Ronaldo and Benzema, the ball is being fed to them in dangerous areas.

Onto Ajax home:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009550/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009550/pitch-view/influence" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... /influence</a>

This shows that Ajax's right centre back and right back combination were pretty poor as we have a hatful of chances on the right edge of the 6 yard box. Otherwise we see a bit of activity around the box, a bit of play by Nasri on the left side and again nothing down the right and this nothing from deep, whereas Ajax have a lot more activity in the central areas spreading into our final third, showing that they are controlling the play through the midfield, our defensive midfield is struggling it seems. Crucially they have a massive blob in the heart of our 6 yard box which is where De Jong bagged both his goals, we all know how bad our set piece defending was in that game and it was key as Ajax offered very little else in our penalty area.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009550/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009550/pitch-view/team-shape" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... team-shape</a>

Here we can see that we have a simple shape, again quite narrow in the midfield with 2 blocks of 4 and we don't see much activity in these areas on the first chart. The fullbacks are also deeper than against Madrid, for Ajax we can clearly see that they don't have an out and out forward and so their activity in our box is low for a reason and the reason they control the ball in the midfield is because they spread out 5 players in that area all interlinking with 1 anchorman, this means that they have 5 bodies converging on our defence unless our defensive midfielders are on top of it, and there is also a fair amount of width in the Ajax attack which means that although they weren't effective in the wide areas it offered more space in the centre where they made more effective plays.

Now onto the reverse fixture:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009526/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009526/pitch-view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... pitch-view</a>

The first thing to notice is the bar at the top where it clearly shows that we have 2 large spells of dominance in the first half but waste one of them. Then in the 2nd half we completely drop off and Ajax have 2 huge spells of dominance and utilise both.

What we see on the chart that in the first half both Clichy and Micah got forward, Micah has plays in the Ajax box and Clichy has activity in Ajax's half as well. You can also see that in the first half(hover over the splodges) we had a higher line as Kompany and Lescott were making passes further up the pitch. Ajax had a number of key splodges around or in our penalty area and once again it was poor defending from set pieces that first undid us. They also have little bits of activity over a wide spread of the pitch but the key thing is those 4 splodges in our area compared to the ones in there's and what they turned into, this was a missed opportunity.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009526/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009526/pitch-view/team-shape" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... team-shape</a>

We can see the Ajax shape hasn't changed but what has is our midfield. It is no longer 2 blocks of 2 but without Garcia Milner has pushed higher up and a bit wider, Yaya links right behind Nasri but with Milner pulling right and Barry staying leftish it offers a bit more room and a bit more ability to spread the ball instead of having it stuck in 2 blocks of 2, the marauding qualities of Micah and Clichy also help but it also means in defending that Milner and Barry can cover onto the 2 most dropped off of the 5 Ajax attackers and Yaya onto their number 5 meaning that Nasri stays free to counter-attack and in the first half it worked well as we were much the better team. The moral is simple mistakes cost you and that front 5 of Ajax caused us problems in the same areas in both games and in both games we lacked something holding in that area.

Onto Dortmund home:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/statistics/round=2000347/matches/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... index.html</a>

This shows clearly that Dortmund were killing us down our left hand side, there is only a small amount of activity down their left so unlike the away game it's not as spread but they are creating a huge amount down that right hand side and into the right hand side of the box. We actually have a nice amount of effective play from our midfield and a little bit of activity down our right side, unfortunately the player map for this doesn't work to look at why.

Onto Madrid away:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009503/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009503/pitch-view/influence" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... /influence</a>

Here we are clearly butchered. Xabi Alonso controls the central areas from deep where the CB's push forward and join in and then through the midfield where they spread out wider where the addition of Marcelo instead of Coentrao means that they attack a lot down the left, even a steady RB in Arbeloa gets forward well. The fullbacks, Ozil, Di Maria, Ronaldo and Essien all contribute a lot around the box and it also shows how they flood the edge of the box in the final third of the match, and the goals come as a result with the small anomaly of Benzema right on the left side of the 6 yard box but we all know Vinnie cocked that one up. We have very little to shout about apart from the one big move between Yaya and Edin on the break.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2013/matches/round=2000347/match=2009503/postmatch/statistics/index.html#1/2013/2000347/2009503/pitch-view/team-shape" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... team-shape</a>

Here we can see our odd midfield formation. There is no-one parallel to Nasri on the left side so it allows Di Maria, Arbeloa and Khedira to build in that area. We can also see in a similar way to Ajax how they have one man deep in Alonso who can allow the play to build but their midfield is spread out, allowing space and the ball to move quickly, Ronaldo splinters off into space and will drag players with him creating even more space. The more advanced position of Di Maria will have also contributed to the fact that Madrid were far more effective attackingly and less narrow than they were in Manchester. You can see that Mancini addresses the Di Maria problem by bringing on AK but our attacking performance changes when Dzeko comes on for Silva, it takes away one of the 4 in the midfield block of 2 + 2(that seems a Mancini trademark at this point) and allows more directness in the midfield. The big problem though comes with the Zabaleta for Maicon change, look at where Zaba's shirt is compared to Maicon, further up and more central, this is why Benzema got in down the left for that 3rd goal, Maicon's positioning up to that point hadn't done too badly, Zabaleta advancing more to where AK was in a "3 at the back" scenario caused the problems at the end, Mancini's change didn't work.

Hope that's some analysis for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.