Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

Taylor is one of city's favoured journalists, and is the one who broke the Mancini to Monaco story. He is very careful to maintain relationships at city. All he's saying is what everyone knows: Txiki's meet with pellegrini's agent is significant. How significant will become clear soon, I believe.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Taylor is one of city's favoured journalists, and is the one who broke the Mancini to Monaco story. He is very careful to maintain relationships at city. All he's saying is what everyone knows: Txiki's meet with pellegrini's agent is significant. How significant will become clear soon, I believe.

Taking over and setting up our youth development
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Taylor is one of city's favoured journalists, and is the one who broke the Mancini to Monaco story. He is very careful to maintain relationships at city. All he's saying is what everyone knows: Txiki's meet with pellegrini's agent is significant. How significant will become clear soon, I believe.
He maybe now
Few years ago he was a tosser and a fucking parasite towards our club
On a regular basis he ripped us apart and just fabricated stories out of thin air
I'm sure he wrote some poisonous article regarding us at the derby the other year and the munich chanting too

Grade A Twat.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Taylor is one of city's favoured journalists, and is the one who broke the Mancini to Monaco story. He is very careful to maintain relationships at city. All he's saying is what everyone knows: Txiki's meet with pellegrini's agent is significant. How significant will become clear soon, I believe.

Anyone who doesn't believe that the meeting was about our managerial position needs their head testing, imo.

However, that said, it doesn't mean Bob is definitely gone. Just a game of brinksmanship as we will no doubt, again, be aware that Bob is touting himself around as well. The meeting between Txiki and MP's agent could easily have been done away from prying eyes however it wasn't as we will have wanted to send a message out there that we are happy to court managers to assess their availability.

Not long to wait now though, the end of the season is nigh.
 
Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position is not the issue. Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position in public less than two weeks before a cup final is an issue as it it is the conduct of an idiot. I would rather Txiki not be an idiot as it does not bode well.

The simple solution, as always. is to conduct any and all sensitive business in private as it avoids potentially destabilising the incumbent at the business end of the season. If I can work that out I am sure Txiki can and if he can't then why the fuck are we employing an idiot?

As for the article it infers that Txiki was caught out in a secret meeting with Pellegrini's agent and City were caught with their pants down and had to hastily cobble together a fictitious story. Now dining with someone in public is not being 'caught in the act' and quite why it is in a story about Moyes is slightly baffling but hey thats the way it goes with us I guess.

So either Txiki is an idiot, the meeting was about players (assuming that Pellegrini's agent has more than one client) or it was two blokes who fancied a boozy lunch plus it doesn't do Pellegrini any harm to have his agent hobnobbing with Txiki.
 
BobKowalski said:
Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position is not the issue. Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position in public less than two weeks before a cup final is an issue as it it is the conduct of an idiot. I would rather Txiki not be an idiot as it does not bode well.

The simple solution, as always. is to conduct any and all sensitive business in private as it avoids potentially destabilising the incumbent at the business end of the season. If I can work that out I am sure Txiki can and if he can't then why the fuck are we employing an idiot?

As for the article it infers that Txiki was caught out in a secret meeting with Pellegrini's agent and City were caught with their pants down and had to hastily cobble together a fictitious story. Now dining with someone in public is not being 'caught in the act' and quite why it is in a story about Moyes is slightly baffling but hey thats the way it goes with us I guess.

So either Txiki is an idiot, the meeting was about players (assuming that Pellegrini's agent has more than one client) or it was two blokes who fancied a boozy lunch plus it doesn't do Pellegrini any harm to have his agent hobnobbing with Txiki.
Nope. You've missed out the most obvious explanation.
 
BobKowalski said:
Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position is not the issue. Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position in public less than two weeks before a cup final is an issue as it it is the conduct of an idiot. I would rather Txiki not be an idiot as it does not bode well.

The simple solution, as always. is to conduct any and all sensitive business in private as it avoids potentially destabilising the incumbent at the business end of the season. If I can work that out I am sure Txiki can and if he can't then why the fuck are we employing an idiot?

As for the article it infers that Txiki was caught out in a secret meeting with Pellegrini's agent and City were caught with their pants down and had to hastily cobble together a fictitious story. Now dining with someone in public is not being 'caught in the act' and quite why it is in a story about Moyes is slightly baffling but hey thats the way it goes with us I guess.

So either Txiki is an idiot, the meeting was about players (assuming that Pellegrini's agent has more than one client) or it was two blokes who fancied a boozy lunch plus it doesn't do Pellegrini any harm to have his agent hobnobbing with Txiki.

Pellegrini and his agent for me are desperate for a pay day and I feel its all there doing all these links to these jobs!

It might just be a pals act by Txiki this public meeting.. I Agree though regarding having this meeting in view of prying eyes, just hope to god like you say we haven't employed an idiot!
 
BobKowalski said:
Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position is not the issue. Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position in public less than two weeks before a cup final is an issue as it it is the conduct of an idiot. I would rather Txiki not be an idiot as it does not bode well.

The simple solution, as always. is to conduct any and all sensitive business in private as it avoids potentially destabilising the incumbent at the business end of the season. If I can work that out I am sure Txiki can and if he can't then why the fuck are we employing an idiot?

As for the article it infers that Txiki was caught out in a secret meeting with Pellegrini's agent and City were caught with their pants down and had to hastily cobble together a fictitious story. Now dining with someone in public is not being 'caught in the act' and quite why it is in a story about Moyes is slightly baffling but hey thats the way it goes with us I guess.

So either Txiki is an idiot, the meeting was about players (assuming that Pellegrini's agent has more than one client) or it was two blokes who fancied a boozy lunch plus it doesn't do Pellegrini any harm to have his agent hobnobbing with Txiki.

Just your guess & hope. Txiki & Ferran is not idiot.
 
Rammy Blue said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Taylor is one of city's favoured journalists, and is the one who broke the Mancini to Monaco story. He is very careful to maintain relationships at city. All he's saying is what everyone knows: Txiki's meet with pellegrini's agent is significant. How significant will become clear soon, I believe.

Anyone who doesn't believe that the meeting was about our managerial position needs their head testing, imo.

However, that said, it doesn't mean Bob is definitely gone. Just a game of brinksmanship as we will no doubt, again, be aware that Bob is touting himself around as well. The meeting between Txiki and MP's agent could easily have been done away from prying eyes however it wasn't as we will have wanted to send a message out there that we are happy to court managers to assess their availability.

Not long to wait now though, the end of the season is nigh.

Oh great. So you are happy that City and Txiki want to play silly buggers at the business end of the season? Christ on a bike. First we have have the Barca duo playing it so low key in the media as to be practically invisible now we have Txiki flaunting it for all the world to see in order to 'send out a message' less than two weeks before the one game left that actually makes the season OK.

Well thats really fucking bright.

Heres how you send a message. At the end of the season with an FA Cup (hopefully) in the bag. Ferran or whoever sits down with Roberto and says we are going in a different direction and will be replacing you as head coach. Thanks for everything and good luck in Monaco (or wherever).

Problem solved. Now can we stop with all the silly bollocks as I have a cup final week to enjoy.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
BobKowalski said:
Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position is not the issue. Txiki meeting with Pellegrini's agent to discuss the managers position in public less than two weeks before a cup final is an issue as it it is the conduct of an idiot. I would rather Txiki not be an idiot as it does not bode well.

The simple solution, as always. is to conduct any and all sensitive business in private as it avoids potentially destabilising the incumbent at the business end of the season. If I can work that out I am sure Txiki can and if he can't then why the fuck are we employing an idiot?

As for the article it infers that Txiki was caught out in a secret meeting with Pellegrini's agent and City were caught with their pants down and had to hastily cobble together a fictitious story. Now dining with someone in public is not being 'caught in the act' and quite why it is in a story about Moyes is slightly baffling but hey thats the way it goes with us I guess.


So either Txiki is an idiot, the meeting was about players (assuming that Pellegrini's agent has more than one client) or it was two blokes who fancied a boozy lunch plus it doesn't do Pellegrini any harm to have his agent hobnobbing with Txiki.
Nope. You've missed out the most obvious explanation.

If you have secret meetings behind peoples backs in a public restaurant your either stupid, or the people who believe it to be so are idiots
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.