J-Bay Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 369
hello said:Brilliant Result would be taking it too far however being a local, on the train back most of the Villa fans seemed pleased with their performance. The fact that SWP/ Tevez/ RSC/ De Jong /Barry all had slightly or very below par games and we came away with a comfortable draw away to a decent side says volumes about the potential of the side.
In the not too distant past if 2/3 players had an off night we would have meekly surrendered and settled for a 2-0 defeat.
16pts from 21 is a good ratio with some tough away games out of the way.
Lets hope we come through through this international break without any injuries.
I think that in addition to the results and points, it is important to consider how we have played in all our games so far, and compare that to how the likes of the Manyoo, Liverpool, Chelski and Arsenal have played.
City : Without playing brilliantly, we have had five good wins, a good draw away from home and a controversial defeat (robbed of a point). In no games have we been poor or very poor - last night's performance was
"OK" by our new standards. In previous years, this would have been considered a good performance and result.
Scum: Have been rank poor at times - Sunderland, Birmingham, Burnley, Arsenal . Sooner or later their luck has to run out and they will not get a favourable decision / freak own goal (has saved them in 2 games). Is Foster the worst goalkeeper in the Prem? if you say no, please name someone worse - I cannot think of anyone!
Liverpool: Up and down - have been quite poor in a few games and the results show it.
Arsenal: Look like City last year - some spectacular big wins and very exiting in attack and when on top, but distinctly shaky in defence.
Chelsea: Look very good MOST of the time, but that terrible performance against Wigan? We have not been anything like as poor against any of our opponents.
In June 2009, bookies gave 50-1 odds on City winning the Prem - if only I could turn the clock back!