Cheesy said:JohnMaddocksAxe said:Don't worry about all that tourism $hite. Last time I looked France does ok for tourism and the Palace of Versaille is a top tourist attraction.
Estimations say that the French President costs the taxpayer over $100m a year. Our Royal Family 'costs' us a bout £30m a year.
Just a comparison you may find interesting :-)
-- Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:39 pm --
lloydie said:Regardless of cost, we could argue all day about that, I for one find it objectionable to be considered the "subject" of anyone no matter how nominal that status is. To continue with this anachronism, despite the obvious undeserved patronage and influence they exert, is a sign of how subservient and reactionary we are as nation. I always find it funny that the very people who moan about the "Nanny state" are usually the ones most in need of Mummy and Daddy figures as heads of state. This country will never grow up whilst we feel the need to worship a bunch freeloaders granted privilege for having ancestors who had the biggest gang on the block a couple of hundred years ago.
Tug away forelock tuggers, I wont ever consider King Chaz with his 5 O levels and pointless, irrational pronouncements as superior to me even if his views continue to influence public opinion and policy.
The fact that you consider yourself to be below them says more about you & your outlook than anything else :-)
You have little grasp of your leige's english if you construed that from my post and even less grasp of the British constitution.
Oops, missed the smiley, Ooh you cheeky subject you!