Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 21,902
A great deal of truth in that post mate. Context is so important.Imperialist yes, white supremacist maybe not. He certainly was at some point in his life but people change and mellow. Many in Victorian Britain were but I certainly don’t think he was later in life.
The problem with history is people look at someone like Churchill, they take one or two quotes from a lifetime of public service and two stints as PM, one during the worst era the country has faced in centuries... and they stroke their black and white brush across him and make unfair accusations.
I hate using copied internet terms like describing him as a white supremacist, which is used now because people have heard others say it, like “war criminal” for Blair darkens every comments section of any video he’s in... however I am going to use one myself... Churchill was deeply flawed as a man but ultimately is a national hero for stopping something much much worse than anything he could have been capable of.
The modern social justice movement really need a grasp on historical context and what life was like back then. They often apply today’s standards to people like Attila the Hun and are gobsmacked when he’s not organising gay rights marches.