inchy14 said:city91 said:SWP's back said:A very not stupid like comment. If we were to sack him the first time he didn't in a pot in a full season, it would be very Chelsea like.
Notice Pep sidestepped Chelsea for the reason of its managerial merry go round
Yeah but surely you can that if the club were to sack him it would be for a number of reasons not just for not winning things.
The club would look at why we didn't win anything.
The club would look at where it went wrong.
The club would look at what can be done to improve.
And it would look at what other managers are available.
Personally I don't think it would be the lack of trophies that will cost Bobby his job. The main reason IMO is the fact that Bobby doesn't,t seem to learn from his mistakes.
We haven't improved in the slightest in Europe in fact we have gone backwards. We keep messing up against the same teams year after year. Everton, Stoke and Sunderland.
Scum struggle at times away at Fulham and Everton, you think they should have got rid of Fergie? Draws at Stoke on the last couple of visits have been due to poor refereeing, not sure what Mancini could have done about them.
On top of this there is the availability of Mourinho.
All I am saying is that our owners have a habit of sticking with managers but yet people come out as if we are the new Chelsea.
When Mansour took over Hughes was already in charge and the club backed Hughes with 100s of millions. Even when Hughes finished lower than Sven despite spending mega money the club still took with him.
Then when we brought Bobby in (which was justifyed IMO) the target was Champions league. We didn't reach that target and the club stuck with Bobby and invested in him heavily.
Christ, he was only here 6 months and nearly managed it.
So I don't buy any of the claims that we are remotely like Chelsea in the slightest regardless of whether we keep Bobby or not.
top postcity91 said:SWP's back said:A very not stupid like comment. If we were to sack him the first time he didn't in a pot in a full season, it would be very Chelsea like.city91 said:People saying don't sack Mancini because we will become like Chelsea, what sort of a stupid comment is that.
Bobby has been here 3 years and if we were to get rid of him it would hardly be a typical Abrhamovic would it. We didn't poach Bobby from another club and we have given him time to build the squad.
I am also quite sure that if the club did get rid of Bobby it would not be knee jerk in the slightest. And there would be in the boards opinion a better manager to replace him with.
Now Guardiola has gone to Bayern I think Bobby should be given another season at least with us. We should back him in the summer but also make it clear that if he fails to get out of the group stage for a third consecutive year then his job will be on the line.
Notice Pep sidestepped Chelsea for the reason of its managerial merry go round
Yeah but surely you can that if the club were to sack him it would be for a number of reasons not just for not winning things.
The club would look at why we didn't win anything.
The club would look at where it went wrong.
The club would look at what can be done to improve.
And it would look at what other managers are available.
Personally I don't think it would be the lack of trophies that will cost Bobby his job. The main reason IMO is the fact that Bobby doesn't,t seem to learn from his mistakes.
We haven't improved in the slightest in Europe in fact we have gone backwards. We keep messing up against the same teams year after year. Everton, Stoke and Sunderland.
On top of this there is the availability of Mourinho.
All I am saying is that our owners have a habit of sticking with managers but yet people come out as if we are the new Chelsea.
When Mansour took over Hughes was already in charge and the club backed Hughes with 100s of millions. Even when Hughes finished lower than Sven despite spending mega money the club still took with him.
Then when we brought Bobby in (which was justifyed IMO) the target was Champions league. We didn't reach that target and the club stuck with Bobby and invested in him heavily.
So I don't buy any of the claims that we are remotely like Chelsea in the slightest regardless of whether we keep Bobby or not.
United beat Fulham 5-0 last season away from home, Mancini still hasn't beaten either of Sunderland, Stoke or Everton away from home in three and a half years. That and Europe are Mancinis biggest problems if he does stay in the job those are the two areas he desperately needs to improve on imo.inchy14 said:city91 said:SWP's back said:A very not stupid like comment. If we were to sack him the first time he didn't in a pot in a full season, it would be very Chelsea like.
Notice Pep sidestepped Chelsea for the reason of its managerial merry go round
Yeah but surely you can that if the club were to sack him it would be for a number of reasons not just for not winning things.
The club would look at why we didn't win anything.
The club would look at where it went wrong.
The club would look at what can be done to improve.
And it would look at what other managers are available.
Personally I don't think it would be the lack of trophies that will cost Bobby his job. The main reason IMO is the fact that Bobby doesn't,t seem to learn from his mistakes.
We haven't improved in the slightest in Europe in fact we have gone backwards. We keep messing up against the same teams year after year. Everton, Stoke and Sunderland.
Scum struggle at times away at Fulham and Everton, you think they should have got rid of Fergie? Draws at Stoke on the last couple of visits have been due to poor refereeing, not sure what Mancini could have done about them.
On top of this there is the availability of Mourinho.
All I am saying is that our owners have a habit of sticking with managers but yet people come out as if we are the new Chelsea.
When Mansour took over Hughes was already in charge and the club backed Hughes with 100s of millions. Even when Hughes finished lower than Sven despite spending mega money the club still took with him.
Then when we brought Bobby in (which was justifyed IMO) the target was Champions league. We didn't reach that target and the club stuck with Bobby and invested in him heavily.
Christ, he was only here 6 months and nearly managed it.
So I don't buy any of the claims that we are remotely like Chelsea in the slightest regardless of whether we keep Bobby or not.
acton28 said:Always been behind MANCINI, always will be. It'll all come in time & support.
What "truth" can you point to?city91 said:But what is it with our fans, anything negative about Mancini and people are quick to defend him not matter what regardless of the truth.