Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Bernardo interfering should have been disallowed sucking spitters bollocks same old shiteWhat did he say?
Bernardo interfering should have been disallowed sucking spitters bollocks same old shiteWhat did he say?
Berardo was offside when Stones headed the ball. He was firstly thought to have been interfering with play, but when reviewed, the referee (and VAR) decided that he wasn’t interfering.Why subjective? You cannot be offside from a corner. Once Stones touched it you can be but Bernardo wasn't interfering with play and not obstructing the keeper.
Arsenal luv this post.Lol sky now are complaining that Bernardo backed into the keeper. Every single team does that multiple times a game.
Bernie touched the keeper before Stones headed the ball and therefore interfered with him.
I thought Doku was terrible and starting to worry about him in general - he looks to have regressedWasn't offside when the ball was played forward so not really sure what the fuss is about
If he'd stayed in front of him as he headed it then I'd understand, but he's 2 or 3 yards to his side as the balls headed
Aside from that, thought we were awful to watch, with the wrong people on the ball far too often
How Gundogan played 90 minutes is lost on me, he is currently the problem in an attacking sense, as he's offering absolutely nothing and just gets in the way
Gvardiol excellent as wete Dias and Stones
Lewis was 'OK' but at fault for the goal, and the rest of the side were average aside from Doku and Savinho who had good first halves but switching them completely killed their flow
this kind of alliance only happens once a blue moon
He has specific attributes that we must play to, and that the opposing team must not prepare well enough for.Probably an unpopular opinon but erling can be a right lazy bastard at times
Really ? WtfIf I'm completely honest I would be absolutely fucked off if that goal was given against us. They played shite all day though and deserved minus points for that performance at home