Does that mean it is obvious or wrong?Too easy a call to say that.
I think Rachford is a good player , but didn't do anything different from what Stirling was doing, the big difference was Luftus Cheek for a invisible Dele Alli . Now it would be interesting if Southgate started with Stirling & Rachford (drop Lingard) having two players that could run at a defence.
Yep, the midfield was shockingly bad
Its all over this forum from knocking Kane or Rashford to defending Sterlings England performances. Its a forum so without doubt people will view the game differently but in some instances its clearly through blue tinted specs.
I see the usual En-ger-land lot are out in force tonight. Can't mods please create a separate thread for them to winge about their national team and anyone who doesn't play for City?
Good win against a stubborn, dirty team. They did fuck all and we won without playing close to our best.
I’d agree with that.
4-3-3.
Walker, Stones, Maguire, Rose
Dier, RLC, Delph
Sterling, Kane, Rashford
In other words we are only 5 players off a reasonable starting 11?! Who says there is a lack of English talent?!2 big things came out of that games for me. We need a left footed left back and we need midfielders in midfield.