urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,823
In my opinion england were average and at times tunsia played a better passing game.
As for sterling he was ok, not worse than lingard, ali was shite as was henderson and honestly without a decent central mid the attackers will struggle, Kane is non existant mainly , but jobs to score and he did it.
For me Walker was MotM as the team performance was average but he was class.
As for england, I watched the game in the friendship fallowfield and it was full of clueless studends but also regulars, only cha.t was 3 lion (probably only thing they know) 3 rwnditions of one ashley young, and the biggest cheer was for Raheems substitution, and I fear a lot of place did the same regarding sterling. Yet rashford was wank when he come on.
Preferably cricket is my national sport and tbh if sterling is gonna get that shit from a pub full of twats every game I will just enjoy the wc and not gonna be arsed supporting anyone
As for sterling he was ok, not worse than lingard, ali was shite as was henderson and honestly without a decent central mid the attackers will struggle, Kane is non existant mainly , but jobs to score and he did it.
For me Walker was MotM as the team performance was average but he was class.
As for england, I watched the game in the friendship fallowfield and it was full of clueless studends but also regulars, only cha.t was 3 lion (probably only thing they know) 3 rwnditions of one ashley young, and the biggest cheer was for Raheems substitution, and I fear a lot of place did the same regarding sterling. Yet rashford was wank when he come on.
Preferably cricket is my national sport and tbh if sterling is gonna get that shit from a pub full of twats every game I will just enjoy the wc and not gonna be arsed supporting anyone